[sustran] Re: Comparative analysis of buses
Todd Alexander Litman
litman at vtpi.org
Mon Aug 25 13:30:05 JST 2008
See, "Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs"
(http://www.vtpi.org/tranben.pdf ) and "Rail Transit In America:
Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefits (http://www.vtpi.org/railben.pdf
), which discuss various factors to consider when evaluating and
comparing public transit services. Public transit provides basic
mobility for non-drivers, and to the degree that it substitutes for
automobile travel, it also reduces traffic congestion, parking
facility costs, consumer costs, accidents, energy consumption,
pollution emissions and sprawl, all benefits that should be
considered in your analysis.
In addition, since public transit travel is concentrated in dense
urban areas where congestion, pollution and parking costs tend to be
particularly intense, and each transit vehicle is driven high annual
kilometers, reductions in their external costs (air and noise
pollution, accident risk, etc.) can provide relatively large
benefits. For example, shifting from current diesel buses to cleaner
diesel or alternative fuels such as CNG, may be one of the most cost
effective ways of reducing urban air pollution. Similarly, creating
urban busways and HOV facilities (http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm19.htm )
may be one of the most cost effective ways of improving urban
transportation because it prevents buses from being stuck in traffic
congestion, improving their performace, reducing their emissions per
vehicle-kilometer, and making public transit more attractive to
people who would otherwise drive.
Best wishes,
-Todd Litman
At 09:02 PM 24/08/2008, H Ghazali wrote:
>Friends,
>
>I am trying to put together a comparative analysis on the costs and
>benefits of buses in order to provide more informed policy options to
>the government. Is there any available information out there on the
>difference in social, economic and environmental costs and benefits of
>a diesel bus, a CNG bus, and an electric bus?
>
>I would especially appreciate it if someone from Kathmandu, Nepal
>could comment on the electric buses running there?
>
>Best regards,
>
>Hassaan Ghazali
>
>--
>Institutional Development Specialist
>Urban Sector Policy and Management Unit (The Urban Unit)
>Planning & Development Department,
>Government of the Punjab
>
>A: 4-B Lytton Road, Lahore, Pakistan
>T: 9213579-84 (Ext.116)
>F: 9213585
>M: 0345 455 6016
>Skype: halgazel
>http://hghazali.googlepages.com
>
>*When conditions are right, everything will go wrong*
>--------------------------------------------------------
>IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via YAHOOGROUPS.
>
>Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss
>to join the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights. The
>yahoogroups version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post
>to the real sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes it
>seem like you can). Apologies for the confusing arrangement.
>
>================================================================
>SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred,
>equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing
>countries (the 'Global South').
More information about the Sustran-discuss
mailing list