[sustran] Re: Second Master Plan for Chennai. - request for comments
Jonathan E. D. Richmond
richmond at alum.mit.edu
Mon Apr 16 13:48:06 JST 2007
The problem is that there is no path for a plan to become reality -- it is
just words in a bound volume, that will gather dust. I have seen this in
too many places.
Actiuon for social and political change must come first --Jonathan
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Carlos F. Pardo wrote:
> Eric,
>
> This is a really interesting indicator of what is being proposed for
> Chennai!! However, I have to note that, contrary to what some people may
> be thinking, I'm opposed to the idea that having this chapter for the
> planning of Chennai would be a waste of writing space and that it will be
> very difficult to implement. When you take a look at other cities'
> history and how they changed their policy, it all starts with writing
> planning proposals that may be "ahead of their time". Some years later,
> some people are actually capable of implementing what had been proposed
> some years back. But you always need the first draft that proposes
> something, some sort of "manifesto". Of course, manifestos have to be
> improved and rewritten. Would it be possible to send some comments to the
> chapter and sign it as "Sustran" or "new mobility" or whatever? We did
> this with Sustran-LAC for the "temporary" changes of the Quito BRT, and
> had some influence in changing it. Sunny's and Eric's comments are a
> start...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Carlos F. Pardo
> Coordinador de Proyecto- Project Coordinator
> GTZ - Proyecto de Transporte Sostenible (SUTP, SUTP-LAC)
> Cl 93A # 14-17 of 708
> Bogotá D.C., Colombia
> Tel/fax: +57 (1) 236 2309 Mobile: +57 (3) 15 296 0662
> carlos.pardo at sutp.org www.sutp.org
>
>
> Eric Britton wrote:
>
> Okay Arul, I have had my first quick look at the draft
> chapter and a couple of things strike me that may end up
> being useful to you and your colleagues as you work to come
> up with an Alternate proposal or suggestions for your Master
> Planners.
>
>
>
> o Strikes me that they are doing a largely competent job in
> setting the stage with the usual purely transport
> statistics in those first pages. It's at least a start.
> Of sorts.
>
> o But then they quickly veer off on old and familiar habits
> -- and if I were to judge it on the basis of my very fast
> look, it would strike me that this is basically driving
> them to "more of the same". And while there is a certain
> amount of comforting language about TDM, passing mentions
> of good Dutch, Danish and German practices, but as a clue
> - on almost every place in the chapter where you see the
> word "demand" it is usually prelude to a conclusion that
> you gotta build something to meet it. I think we have
> seen that before.
>
>
>
> o The Bible that my old grandmother used to carry around
> with her, says that a man who will steal a talon (a
> penny_ will steal your fortune. So I say down and ran a
> bunch of words through a frequency scan and here is what
> I came up with.
>
> o Accident - 1. Sprawl - 1. Waiting -1. Environment -
> 2. Bicycle - 2. Maintenance - 3. Safe/safety - 4. TDM
> - 4. Congestion - 6. Parking - 30.
>
> o Health - 0. Injury - 0. Handicapped - 0, Elderly - 0,
> Disabled - 0. Respiratory - 0. Death - 0. Life - 0.
>
> o Children - 0. Gender - 0. Women - 0. Female - 0.
>
> o Walking - 0. Public space - 0. Parks - 0, Community -
> 0, Participation - 0. Independent - 0.
>
> o Ecology/ecological - 0. Planet - 0. CO2 - 0. GHG -
> 0. Greenhouse - 0,
>
>
>
> o Traffic - 46.
>
> o Roads -124 times.
>
> I guess that gives us a few clues, and while I have a number of
> further thoughts on this, let me get off the stage and her what
> the others have to offer.
>
>
>
> Eric Britton
>
>
>
> PS. May I suggest in the interests of economy that these
> discussions continue mainly in Sustran and the New Mobility
> Agenda Idea Factory, and I hope that we shall be hearing from our
> Gatnet friends (www.gatnet.net) on this as well? Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Posted by: "arul rathinam" arulgreen at yahoo.com
>
> Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:15 pm (PST)
>
> Dear Friends
>
> Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA)
> published the draft version of the Second Master Plan
> for Chennai on 11 April 2007. Any person interested in
> Master Plan II could send in their suggestions to CMDA
> on or before 12 July 2007.
>
> We, as a NGO, wish to bring an `Alternate' Second
> Master Plan for Chennai, particularly on Transport. We
> are planning to organize awareness campaign and
> consultation meetings for it.
>
> I am attaching the link to Transport Chapter from the
> Second Master Plan for Chennai.
>
> http://www.cmdachennai.org/design/pdfs/SMP/D_Chapt%20%20IV%20_Transportation.pdf
>
>
> We need your advice and support.
>
> with kind regards.
>
> R.ARUL,
> Secretary,
> PASUMAI THAAYAGAM (Green Mother Land),
> No. 9,(old No: 5), Lyn wood Lane,
> Mahalingapuram,
> CHENNAI -600 034,
> Tamil Nadu,
> INDIA.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> --------------------------------------------------------
> IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via YAHOOGROUPS.
>
> Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss to join the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights. The yahoogroups version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post to the real sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes it seem like you can). Apologies for the confusing arrangement.
>
> ================================================================
> SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred, equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing countries (the 'Global South').
>
>
>
-----
Jonathan Richmond
1 (617) 395-4360
e-mail: richmond at alum.mit.edu
http://the-tech.mit.edu/~richmond/
More information about the Sustran-discuss
mailing list