[sustran] Re: Guangzhou bans electric bicycles
Chris Bradshaw
c_bradshaw at rogers.com
Wed Nov 29 02:25:41 JST 2006
Thanks for the references. I have heard that bikes are now being offered as
an accessory to some new car models.
I viewing the sites, I was surprised to find no folding bikes in the lot.
Carrying a bike on the outside of a car, or dissembling it to carry it
inside (and taking up all the space behind the front seats) seems to not
make sense.
I have been a folding-bike owner (and user, as I haven't used 700-mm-wheeled
bikes for 40 years) for this reason: a full-sized frame and large wheels
reduce the utility of a bike, reducing its ability to fit into mixed-mode
trips, reducing its cargo carrying capacity (one can hang bags from the
front handle bars without them rubbing the front tire), and they usually
come with a full set of accessories.
My latest, a Brompton, has fenders with mud guards, a rear carrier with two
double bungie cords, a chain guard, a full generator-run light set (which is
not turning out to be very reliable), a pump, and a bell. And it has 3x2
gears (internal/external) and rear suspension. It folds in 12 seconds into
a 20"x20"x10" locked shape that can be carried over one's shoulder.
Yes, this one is high end ($1200 U.S., bought in June from a shop in
Manhattan). But our Wal-Mart sells an off-shore Next model for $150 Can.
Chris Bradshaw
p.s. re: "positional goods": Litman's reference to this neglects to point
out that the concept shows up in people who use their lack of a car or their
folding bike as a "prestige" acquisition (the term was first coined by Fred
Hirsch in his 1978 book, _The Social Limits to Growth_).
More information about the Sustran-discuss
mailing list