[sustran] Re: Bus, LRT, and heavy rail - comments from a by-stander
Regina_Therese_MANZO at ura.gov.sg
Regina_Therese_MANZO at ura.gov.sg
Tue May 4 13:35:30 JST 2004
Hello Jonathan and Sustran -
Gina Manzo wrote:
It reminds me of boys
and their need to be "king of the hill", the need to strive for the
superlative - in sport, warfare, in the professional field, etc. Perhaps
everyone needs to go out for a good joust or round of football/soccer.
Jonathan replied:
Alas, Gina, there is indeed a risk of the arguments appearing this way,
but with such a characterization
it appears that both sides are in an
advocacy position and neither one nor the other has a special claim on the
truth.
This is the case - neither postion does have "a special claim on the
truth." Both rail and bus are important, and the complexities of each
have to be assessed for each metro region. Let's understand more details
of each so we can better use each as appropriate in a sustainable
transport system - not one at the exclusion of the other.
regards,
Gina
Regina Manzo, AICP X Urban Redevelopment Authority X 45 Maxwell Road X
URA Centre X Singapore 069118 X? ph +65 6321-8305 X
Privileged / Confidential information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or use
it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person. Please
notify the sender immediately if you receive this in error.? http://www.ura.gov.sg
"Jonathan E. D. Richmond" <richmond at alum.mit.edu>
Sent by:
sustran-discuss-bounces+regina_therese_manzo=ura.gov.sg at list.jca.apc.org
04/05/2004 12:12
Please respond to Asia and the Pacific sustainable transport
To: Asia and the Pacific sustainable transport
<sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org>
cc:
Subject: [sustran] Re: Bus, LRT, and heavy rail - comments from a by-stander
Gina Manzo wrote:
It reminds me of boys
and their need to be "king of the hill", the need to strive for the
superlative - in sport, warfare, in the professional field, etc. Perhaps
everyone needs to go out for a good joust or round of football/soccer.
Alas, Gina, there is indeed a risk of the arguments appearing this way,
but with such a characterization it appears that both sides are in an
advocacy position and neither one nor the other has a special claim on the
truth.
Pro-rail forces have distorted data, sometimes because their advocacy has
simply led them to take the most positive assumptions, but also sometimes
through outright dishonesty. The performance results in the US are quite
clear, as I found in a comprehensive study that set out to be entirely
objective.
Unfortunately, there are rail opponents who are against public transport
in general. Some of them favor more roadbuilding; others are against any
form of public expenditure on transport systems. The presence of their
arguments clouds the issues and does indeed make it all appear like a
football (or possibly boxing) match, and it becomes extremely hard for
people like myself who care about providing good value transport systems
-- especially to serve the poorest members of society -- to get the truth
through.
--Jonathan
-----
Jonathan E. D. Richmond 02 524-5510 (office)
Visiting Fellow Intl.: 662 524-5510
Transportation Engineering program
School of Civil Engineering, Room N260B 02 524-8257 (home)
Asian Institute of Technology Intl.: 662 524-8257
PO Box 4
Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120 02 524-5509 (fax)
Thailand Intl: 662 524-5509
e-mail: richmond at ait.ac.th Secretary: Ms. Nisarat Hansuksa
richmond at alum.mit.edu 02
524-6051
Intl: 662 524-6051
http://the-tech.mit.edu/~richmond/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/private/sustran-discuss/attachments/20040504/875e1495/attachment.html
More information about the Sustran-discuss
mailing list