[CML 008208] グランサコネ通信2011-12

maeda at zokei.ac.jp maeda at zokei.ac.jp
2011年 3月 16日 (水) 18:34:52 JST


グランサコネ通信2011-12
3月16日
*
3月15日、ジュネーヴで開催中の国連人権理事会第16会期において、NGO
の国際人権活動日本委員会は、朝鮮学校の高校無償化からの除外問題について発
言しました。
*

THE JAPANESE WORKERS’COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
2-33-10 Minami-Otsuka, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN 
tel:+81-3-3943-2420 fax:+81-3-5395-3240  e-mail: hmrights at mx16.freecom.
ne.jp


Human Rights Council 
16 session
Item 5
15 March 2011

Korean Minorities in Japan

Statement by Mr. Akira MAEDA
Professor of Tokyo Zokei University

on behalf of the
 
Japanese Workers’Committee for Human Rights (JWCHR)

Geneva, 15 March 2011

 Mr. President

 I thank to you and all persons here for your support, sympathy and 
solidarity to Japanese people suffering from the earthquake and the 
following tsunami—without electricity, food and drinking water.

 We have reported the situation of minorities in Japan to former 
Commission on Human Rights and Human Rights Council for more than 10 
years. Unfortunately the situation of minorities in Japan, in short, has 
grown worse for 10 years. We welcome the report and presentation of 
Forum on Minorities Issue by Ms. Gay McDougal. In this regard, we would 
like to introduce you the new violation of human rights of minorities by 
Japanese Government.

 Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination recommended in its 
concluding observations (CERD/C/JPN/CO/3-6) in 11 March 2010 to the 
Japanese government to stop the discriminatory policy against Korean 
Minorities in Japan. Committee on Right of Child followed it in 20 June 
2010 (CRC/C/JPN/CO/3).

 Nevertheless, Government of Japan has continued to exclude only Korean 
minorities from “Free High School Tuition Bill,” whose purpose is to 
alleviate the financial burdens of high school education of household. 
Surprisingly the discriminatory treatment was ordered directly by Prime 
Minister, Mr. Kan himself. It can be said that this is absolute racial 
discrimination and political violence 

Korean schools are facing the financial difficulty under the 
discriminative policy of Japanese government such as non-governmental 
aid or non-adaptation of exemption of taxation on donation to school. On 
such problem, Human Rights Committee made recommendation in the past (
for example para 31, CCPR/C/JPN/CO/5.) .The financial burden of Korean 
minorities is five times than that of Japanese.

In addition, Korean minorities are subjected to attack by Japanese 
civilian as often as news of DPR Korea is excessively reported by 
Japanese mass media. Korean minorities cannot go out wearing their own 
traditional wear because of fear of attacking. Although hate crimes has 
increased for dacade, the government has taken no measures to prevent 
hate crimes. How can this crazy situation be allowed in Japan?




The Asahi Shimbun, Feb. 24, 2010
EDITORIAL: Free school education
There is no reason to exclude Korean Students.

  Just before Diet deliberations begin on a bill to make high school 
education tuition-free, Hiroshi Nakai, state minister in charge of the 
abduction issue, asked education minister Tatsuo Kawabata to exclude 
chosen gakko schools for Korean children in Japan.
  North Korea has been developing nuclear arms and missiles, defying 
international criticism and sanctions. The country has also refused to 
cooperate with Japan in resolving the issue of Japanese citizens 
abducted by North Korean agents.
  The reason behind Nakai's request appears to be that chosen gakko are 
under the influence of the General Association of Korean Residents in 
Japan (Chongryon), which supports North Korea.
  Japan has good reason to take a tough stance toward North Korea and 
exert the necessary diplomatic pressure. But should education for Korean 
children in Japan be considered from the same point of view?
  Of chosen gakko around the country, 10 are kokyu gakko, the equivalent 
of high schools. Nearly 2,000 children attend these schools.
  Chosen gakko originated in schools that Koreans established to 
reinstate the use of their native language after the end of World War II.
  There was a period when these schools conducted strict ideological 
education after they came under Pyongyang's influence through Chongryon, 
founded in 1955.
  The content of education, however, has shifted dramatically through 
generational changes among Korean residents.
  Most of the classes are given in Korean. But the curriculum is largely 
in line with the education ministry's guidelines for Japanese schools, 
except for some courses, such as the one on Korean history.
  A growing number of Koreans send their children to chosen gakko to 
cherish their own language and culture, even though they do not support 
the North Korean regime.
  There used to be portraits of Kim Il Sung, North Korea's founder, and 
Kim Jong Il, his son and the current leader, in all chosen gakko 
classrooms.
  In response to requests from parents, however, the portraits have been 
removed from schools that correspond to elementary and junior high 
schools.
  Such a trend is expected to only grow stronger.
  Chosen gakko are all financially strained. The central government 
provides no financial aid, although the schools receive local government 
subsidies.
  Parents bear a heavy financial burden as they are asked to make 
donations on top of the annual tuition of about 400,000 yen ($4,400).
  With the free tuition bill, the government aims to create a society in 
which all high school students can concentrate on studies without 
worrying about financing.
  The bill, approved by the Cabinet last month, covers not only public 
and private high schools and technical colleges but also various 
institutions with comparable high school curriculums.
  It was assumed that the latter category would include schools for 
Brazilians, Chinese and Koreans.
  Guaranteeing all children the right to learn, including those with 
foreign citizenship, is a basic principle of the Democratic Party of 
Japan's education policy. Excluding chosen gakko students, who are 
members of Japanese society, from the initiative would go against the 
principle.
  On Tuesday, Kawabata said neither diplomatic considerations nor the 
content of education would be a factor in deciding on eligibility for 
the program.
  We suggest that Nakai visit a chosen gakko with Kawabata.
  He would find that students are no different from their counterparts 
at Japanese schools. They aspire to go on to university, take part in 
sports and worry about their future.



 . 




CML メーリングリストの案内