<html>
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Verdana;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:black;
        font-weight:normal;
        font-style:normal;
        text-decoration:none none;}
p.NormalWeb1, li.NormalWeb1, div.NormalWeb1
        {margin-top:0cm;
        margin-right:0cm;
        margin-bottom:7.2pt;
        margin-left:0cm;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:Arial;}
@page Section1
        {size:21.0cm 842.0pt;
        margin:2.0cm 76.55pt 2.0cm 3.0cm;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:15.6pt;background:white'><b><font size=2
color="#323232" face=Verdana><span lang=DE style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Verdana;color:#323232;font-weight:bold'><a
href="http://www.transportenvironment.org/Category7-All.html">T&E Bulletin</a>:
<a href="http://www.transportenvironment.org/Article269.html">Constitutional
reform key to reinstatement of city charge</a></span></font></b></p>
<p class=NormalWeb1 style='line-height:15.6pt;background:white'><font size=2
color="#646464" face=Verdana><span lang=DE style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Verdana;color:#646464'>Oct 25, 2006 </span></font></p>
<p class=NormalWeb1 style='line-height:15.6pt;background:white'><font size=2
color="#646464" face=Verdana><span lang=DE style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
Verdana;color:#646464'>Negotiations are continuing on reinstating
Stock-holm’s congestion charge after last month’s local referendum
and parliamentary election. <br>
<br>
In the referendum, the citizens most affected by the charge voted in favour of
it being made permanent after a seven-month trial earlier this year. But
because under Sweden’s constitution it cannot come into effect without
approval from the national parliament, and as the ruling red-green national
coalition lost its majority on the same day, confusion has reigned over whether
the charge will be reinstated.<br>
<br>
Two weeks after the election, the new national centre-right coalition, whose
biggest party opposed the whole idea of charging, surprisingly announced plans
to reinstate the charge but to use the revenue to fund the building of a
controversial by-pass west of Stockholm instead of improvements to public
transport, as most has expected. This plan received a hostile reception, but it
is likely that some sort of charge will be reintroduced within a year.<br>
<br>
In addition, the new government announced that a committee reviewing the
constitution will be instructed to deliver a proposal for an amendment that
will pass responsibility for congestion charging from parliament to local
authorities. <br>
<br>
<em><i><font face=Verdana><span style='font-family:Verdana'>This news story is
taken from the <a
href="http://www.transportenvironment.org/Downloads-req-getit-lid-441.html">October
2006 edition of T&E Bulletin</a>.</span></font></i></em> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>