<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="PostalCode"/> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="City"/> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="State"/> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="country-region"/> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="place"/>  <style>  </style> </head> <body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue> <div class=Section1> Hi Todd,<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Seems like a social trap in the making isn’t it?<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Jojo<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'> <hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1> </div> From: sustran-discuss-bounces+cvegjl=nus.edu.sg@list.jca.apc.org [mailto:sustran-discuss-bounces+cvegjl=nus.edu.sg@list.jca.apc.org] On Behalf Of Todd Alexander Litman Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 12:39 AM To: Asia and the Pacific sustainable transport Subject: [sustran] Re: Chinese tax for big cars<o:p></o:p> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Help what? Taxes on luxury cars may be justified on equity grounds (to "soak the rich"), but a strategy that simply increases average fuel economy will reduce the per-mile cost of driving, which tends to increase annual mileage per vehicle, offsetting some of the energy savings and increasing most other transportation problems including congestion, accidents, risk to non-drivers, road and parking facility costs, sprawl, and many types of pollution. See "Efficient Vehicles Versus Efficient Transportation" (<a href="http://www.vtpi.org/cafe.pdf" eudora=autourl> http://www.vtpi.org/cafe.pdf</a> ). I've seen environmentalists devote excessive effort to one or two energy conservation strategies, such as CAFE standards and Feebates, while overlooking far more effective and beneficial strategies such as road and parking pricing reforms, converting fixed vehicle fees to pay-as-you-drive pricing, and increasing investment in alternative modes. Focusing on just one planning objective at a time, such as increased fuel economy, often results in planning decisions that solve one problem but exacerbate others, making society worse off overall. True sustainability requires more comprehensive decision-making, which finds true "Win-Win" solutions, that is, solutions to one problem that also help solve other economic, social and environmental problems, or at least avoid making them worse (<a href="http://www.vtpi.org/winwin.pdf" eudora=autourl> http://www.vtpi.org/winwin.pdf </a>). Best wishes, -Todd Litman At 04:19 AM 3/30/2006Carlos F. Pardo  wrote: <o:p></o:p> Only for cars with engines over four liters, but it could help... Original source: <a href="http://www.worldwatch.org/features/chinawatch/stories/20060323-2" eudora=autourl>http://www.worldwatch.org/features/chinawatch/stories/20060323-2</a> <<a href="http://www.worldwatch.org/features/chinawatch/stories/20060323-2" eudora=autourl> http://www.worldwatch.org/features/chinawatch/stories/20060323-2</a> >  <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">China</st1:place></st1:country-region> Imposes Consumption Tax on Large Cars, Environmentally Un-sound Goods March 23, 2006 By Zijun Li Starting April 1, Chinese consumers who buy cars with engine capacities of more than four liters will be required to pay a consumption tax of 20 percent, according to a joint notice <<a href="http://news.sohu.com/20060322/n242403990.shtml%3e " eudora=autourl> http://news.sohu.com/20060322/n242403990.shtml> </a>issued by the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on March 21. The measure puts a higher tax burden on larger, energy-inefficient vehicles and reflects the government's recent embrace of a "small car policy." Under the revised tax policy, the rate for small cars with a capacity of 1.0 to 1.5 liters will decrease to 3 percent, two percentage points lower than before. Cars of 1.5 to 2.0 liters will continue to enjoy a tax rate of 5 percent, and rates for cars of more than two liters will range from 9-20 percent. To encourage more-efficient resource use and the development of a so-called "circular" economy, the revised consumption tax also covers certain items made of exhaustible resources including disposable chopsticks, wood flooring, and other solid wood products, levying a 5 percent tax on them. According to Xinjin News <<a href="http://gb.chinabroadcast.cn/8606/2006/03/22/106@956917.htm" eudora=autourl> http://gb.chinabroadcast.cn/8606/2006/03/22/106@956917.htm</a>> , China produced 85 million square meters of solid wood flooring in 2004, most of which was made by individual manufacturers. And the country's <st1:State w:st="on">northern provinces</st1:State> produce an estimated 15 billion disposable chopsticks for export to <st1:country-region w:st="on">Japan</st1:country-region> and <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Korea</st1:place></st1:country-region> every year, consuming some 13 million cubic meters of timber. As Chinese consumption levels have changed with rapid economic development and a rise in personal incomes, the country's decade-old consumption tax had failed to keep pace with these changes. Therefore, a new range of items, such as golf equipment and yachts, have been added to the revised policy, levied at the rate of 10 percent. Meanwhile, commodities that have become everyday essentials, such as shampoo and moisturizers, have been removed from the list. Other items now taxed at lower rates include cigarettes, alcohol, jet fuel, automobile tires, and motorcycles. <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">China</st1:place></st1:country-region> first levied a tax on consumer goods in 1994. The initial ruling covered 11 categories of goods, including cigarettes, alcohol, cosmetics, skin- and hair-care products, jewelry, firecrackers, gasoline, diesel, automobile tires, and motorcycles. In total, <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">China</st1:place></st1:country-region>'s tax revenue, exclusive of tariffs and agricultural taxes, reached 3.09 trillion yuan (US $380.6 billion) in 2005, increasing 20 percent from 2004. <o:p></o:p> </x-sigsep><x-sigsep> Sincerely, Todd Alexander Litman Victoria Transport Policy Institute (<a href="http://www.vtpi.org" eudora=autourl>www.vtpi.org</a>) litman@vtpi.org Phone & Fax 250-360-1560 <st1:place w:st="on">1250 Rudlin Street, <st1:City w:st="on">Victoria</st1:City>, <st1:State w:st="on">BC</st1:State>, <st1:PostalCode w:st="on">V8V 3R7</st1:PostalCode>, <st1:country-region w:st="on">CANADA</st1:country-region></st1:place> “Efficiency - Equity - Clarity”  <o:p></o:p> </div> </body> </html>