[sustran] Where the pedestrian is king of the road

Vinay Baindur yanivbin at gmail.com
Fri Mar 9 13:03:41 JST 2012


http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/article2974593.ece

Where the pedestrian is king of the roadAjai Sreevatsan
[image: New York City is looking at its streets as really valuable real
estate and working on how it can be used for its highest purpose, says
Janette Sadik-Khan. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty]
The Hindu New York City is looking at its streets as really valuable real
estate and working on how it can be used for its highest purpose, says
Janette Sadik-Khan. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty

Cities should move on from pampering the car driver to facilitating public
transport, cycling and walking, says the New York City Transport
Commissioner.

*India has a chance to escape the nightmare of urban traffic and pollution.
The 600 million people projected to live in the country's bustling cities
by 2030 should have the courage to dream of a future where sustainable,
equitable and green urban zones could be a reality. So feels New York City
Transport Commissioner **Janette Sadik-Khan**, who was recently in Chennai,
and spoke to **Ajai Sreevatsan** about making cities work better. Excerpts
from the interview:*

*What is your vision of an ideal city?*

Firstly, a city administration's investments must improve the quality of
life and the economic development opportunities of the city. The two go
very much hand-in-hand. The fact that our cities are growing should be used
as a lever to invest in the city's basic transport, energy, housing and
other systems with a comprehensive approach…It's not about working in
silos. It really needs integrated attention across all agencies. I mean, my
agency might have just repaved the road. And the next week, the utilities
company would come in and dig up the road. Citizens of New York would look
at it and think crazy people ran their city. Come on, can't you coordinate
that better?

*In most Indian cities, the number of cars on the road has doubled or
tripled in the last decade. This is largely seen as aping the American
model of urban life. Is America having second thoughts on its model?*

Other cities need not repeat our mistakes. If you look at Detroit … even
they are building a light rail system to bring down the reliance on cars.
That's what it is going to take to make cities work well. You really need
an effective public transport system, an effective cycling network and an
effective way for people to get around by walking. The motorcar should not
be the priority. It is something that cities like Chennai and Delhi should
take to heart if they wish to leapfrog past our mistakes.

Prioritisation of green spaces, open spaces and public transport — all of
those are going to be the hallmarks of a great city in the 21st century.

*Did you try walking on Chennai's streets?*

(*Laughs*) We actually did. Had to dodge in and out of traffic amidst an
incredible tangle of congestion. It felt like a video game. That's a
challenge that is not limited to Chennai. Until recently, New York's
approach to transportation had been the same since the 1950s. It basically
[looked at transit] from behind a driver's steering wheel and the idea was
to make it as easy as possible for cars to go as fast as possible. That
idea has outlived its usefulness. And now, we are increasingly looking at
the 6,000 miles of streets we have in New York City as really valuable real
estate. How do we use this real estate for its highest purpose? We are not
going to be pouring more concrete, asphalt and steel to expand our road
network. We just have to be more effective in how we allocate the use of
this space on the streets. That means three big things – providing bike
tracks, bus lanes and sufficient space for pedestrians. Walking is the
healthiest way to get around outside of cycling, and a third of New Yorkers
do just that. But it's really hard to find a place to sit down. Providing
pubic seating is very important. We also need to make it safe. We need to
make it attractive. We need to have places that people want to be in.

*New York introduced dedicated lanes for public transport buses in 2008.
Interestingly, the average bus speed in New York until 2007 (seven kmph)
mirrors the current experience of Indian cities. Have you seen the public
transport bus system here? How can they be improved?*

Buses, till recently, were this poor stepchild of our transportation
network. And not surprisingly, New York had the slowest bus speeds in the
United States till 2007. Now we have three million people using buses
daily. It is very important that we prioritise the travel for those people.
We have redesigned our streets to give a dedicated lane for buses and
priority at signal junctions. We are using traffic cameras to keep the
lanes clean and clear of cars. We ticket cars that come into the bus
lanes—about 7,000 tickets a month. That's been a great way of preserving
the integrity of the bus lane. I think a bus rapid transit system would be
a plus in Indian cities. A priority bus lane is the mark of effective
cities. Buses move more people, so they should get more priority than
single persons driving themselves. It is very important and it can be done
quickly and inexpensively. Subway lines, on the other hand, are very
expensive to build. New York has a big underground network with 469
stations. But it takes too long to build.

Keywords: urban
planning<http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/article2974593.ece?css=print#>
, urban transport<http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/article2974593.ece?css=print#>
, traffic management<http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/article2974593.ece?css=print#>
, pedestrian rights<http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/article2974593.ece?css=print#>

Printable version | Mar 9, 2012 9:31:36 AM |


More information about the Sustran-discuss mailing list