[sustran] Re: A very short list of very bad practices
Chris Bradshaw
c_bradshaw at rogers.com
Tue Aug 2 02:16:11 JST 2011
The reference to "enclosure" (as per the special Ecologist issue of 1993) is
apt. The spaces between properties has always been "public" in the sense
that anyone can use it for truly public purposes, on the assumption that
their use is relatively frugal, space- and time-wise.
Yes, some "commons-sharing" works in long-time resource sharing situations,
as Nobel Economics-prize winner, Elinor Ostrom (in Governing the Commons,
1995, and elsewhere) has proven. B ut the city is a much different place;
too many people, too anonymously related. We can't expect a committee to
form in each block to protect the common resources of public space.
The introduction of cars has created this crisis. The car, itself, is an
enclosure, but of about 20 times the space a pedestrian needs for fairly
free movement. Driver locks his enclosure when he leaves his car, denying
any passersby access to 4-6 seats that pedestrians never can find when they
need it. Drivers also assume they have privacy in their cars, and will use
tinted glass to get it, also masking their identity in cases in which their
driving has injured or endangered vulnerable road users. If a passerby even
leans against the car's exterior, it is seen as a major social faux pas.
In Canada, we are settling land claims with aboriginal people, as process
that is well over a hundred years old. This is somewhat ironic, since
aboriginals' system of wisdom doesn't provide for the European model of
private ownership (enclosure). I live in downtown Ottawa, on lands which
are still being negotiated over.
But what about the public places, as the European system has created: the
spaces that form the public-access system that all properties front on?
People on foot, and those who own common conveyances for hire (e.g.,
rickshaws) of fairly frugal dimensions, are being pushed off their land by
vehicles that are far larger, faster, heavier, and less frugally utilized,
all to provide a private space for its own owner while in the public domain.
Cars are an invention that has no use except to be used in public spaces.
Because of private ownership, the car is much larger/heavier than urban use
dictates, its versatility being our bane.
We should initiate land claims in the name of aboriginal trnsportation modes
and their users to get back these places. The provision of sidewalks, which
are meant to display a kind of sharing of this space, fails badly when those
on foot want to get across the street to the other side. As was pointed
out, crossing at places where it is approved, is often more dangerous than
doing it mid-block where is is supposedly more dangerous. When did
pedestrians give up our right to cross the street freely and safely? The
problem arises because the motor-traffic portion has been improved to appear
to be a singular conduit channeling vehicles from far and wide along that
stretch of space, while the thousands of different walking routes that
transcect are formalized ('enclosed').
Ottawa has just put in separated bike lanes along the sidewalk edge along a
10-block section of a downtown street. A number of parking spaces were
removed to make room for it, but also it has become more of a problem for
pedestrians to cross the street, with these stand-alone curbs creating a
barrier that is more problematic than the sidewalk's curb (since there is a
drop-off on both sides). At corners, crosswalks have been shifted further
from the sidewalk alignment to make way for a bike 'island' to be used by
cyclists turning left. When I questioned the proposal, I was told this will
increase the modal share for cycling, which is what happened when Copenhagen
installed them thoughout the downtown. But I now realize that they are
intended to keep the cyclists out of the motorists' way, more than the
reverse. Copenhagen already had achieved its legendary cycling modal share;
it was motorists who found the 'going' tough downtown, who probably demanded
some separation.
Chris Bradshaw
More information about the Sustran-discuss
mailing list