[sustran] Re: Cities need mobility, not cars

[Todd Edelman]

Hi Morten, Hi all,

Ahhh... language and meaning and intention...

This particular idea has come up numerous times amongst various people 
involved with Carbusters and World Carfree Network, and Eric Britton has 
made it clear that he thinks - paraphrasing here - that density, 
decentralisation and related is a necessary pre-condition for "New 
Mobility".

Also - getting into one important part of it - I have tried to re-define 
a "car" as an inappropriately-utilized automobile and an "automobile" 
has a rubber-tyred, unguided road vehicle with capacity of 12 persons or 
less. (This does not generally mean that "carshare" vehicles are cars, 
of course -- especially if enabled by my attempt at a refined definition 
within the urban milieu, you consider "cars" as heroin and "carshare" as 
methadone). I have created this definition because it seems simpler than 
"appropriately-utilized car" or similar or much more wordy and the 
reverse of it. "Car" is in this case not a technical term, but 
"automobile" is. "Car" is marketing, emotion, it is informal. 
"Automobile" - and its supporting infrastructure - is a possible 
solution. You /grok/*?

So... back to what Morten's suggestion: He is exactly right. And seated 
at the base of the tree to which he refers, rather than precariously 
situated elsewhere. (Perhaps a more Icelandic metaphor would substitute 
"ashcloud" and "earth's burning liquid core").

Mobility is a sub-category of Access.

- T

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok



On 06/10/2010 12:44 PM, Morten Lange wrote:
> Dear Vinay,
>
> Good article !
>
> One comment that pops to mind is that some people talk of access, rather than mobility.
>
> For instance that would include improved access to services / shops by decentralising them. This can be done e.g. by urban planning including financial incentives that will influence where services are located. This as an addition to improving access for more effective and equitable modes. So access is improved not only by improving how many people get move about per /hour / per square-kilometer / per million dollar or Lakh /per unit of health or pollution.
>
> The "Access-paradigm" also inherently takes into account the needs of different segments of the populations. That is, the access-paradigm as I have perceived it.
>
> I might be out on a limb here, but take my chances, in order to get the opportunity to learn and discuss.
>
> --
> Regards / Kvedja
> Morten Lange, Reykjavík
>
>
> --- On Sat, 5/6/10, Vinay Baindur<yanivbin at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>    
>> From: Vinay Baindur<yanivbin at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [sustran] Cities need mobility, not cars
>> To: "CAF2"<citizens-action-forum at googlegroups.com>, "Hasire Usiru"<hasiruusiru at yahoogroups.com>, "Hu Gov"<hu_governance at googlegroups.com>
>> Date: Saturday, 5 June, 2010, 11:30
>> *URBAN ENVIRONMENT*
>>
>> *Anumita Roychowdhury*, Centre for Science and Environment
>>
>> *Cities need mobility, not cars*
>>
>> Our cities are in a mess and the clutter will grow. Recent
>> number crunching
>> by global consulting firm McKinsey and Co. Llc predicts an
>> urban population
>> in India of 590 million by 2030—nearly twice the size of
>> the current US
>> population and 40% of the total projected Indian
>> population. Cities, which
>> account for 70% of India’s GDP (gross domestic product),
>> will drive the
>> economy. But these same cities are on a toxic spiral, urged
>> on by growing
>> wastefulness, energy use and car mania. The current
>> obsession with car-based
>> infrastructure and urban sprawl will only increase car
>> dependency, travel
>> distances, energy and the pollution intensity of travel.
>>
>> The choking haze of pollution and growing illnesses are the
>> scary evidence
>> of urban growth. The International Energy Agency warns that
>> cars will also
>> drive energy demand. Currently, one-third of our urban
>> population in three
>> mega-cities accounts for nearly half of the carbon
>> emissions from transport.
>> Parking needs are devouring urban commons—10% of
>> urbanized Delhi is wasted
>> as parking spaces.
>>
>> Can we make our cities livable? Make public health, urban
>> design quality and
>> community well-being the basis of this growth?
>>
>> Our future depends on the choices we make today. And the
>> choices are clear
>> in our densely built cities, where the bulk of all travel
>> trips have short
>> distances—5-10km. In fact, walking and bicycling make up
>> more than a quarter
>> of all trips in major cities and greater than half in small
>> towns. Public
>> transport and para-transit modes meet more than three
>> quarters of the
>> passenger demand for motorized transport. Protect and scale
>> up this
>> strength, and ensure equity in allocation of road space to
>> all users.
>>
>> Make the change real. Leverage the emerging policy
>> opportunities—reform-based agenda of the Jawaharlal Nehru
>> National Urban
>> Renewal Mission and the clean air action plans. Cities must
>> deliver on
>> public transport reforms, control pollution sources and
>> pursue innovative
>> measures to restrain the car bulge. There is no other way.
>>
>> Look at Delhi. With less than a quarter of households
>> owning cars, and
>> despite the largest road network, life’s ebbed out of its
>> streets. Road
>> widening and flyovers have not helped.
>>
>> The signpost is clear: Cities need mobility, not cars.
>> Scale up alternative
>> mobility choices, set the post-2010 road map to leapfrog
>> vehicle technology,
>> and redesign cities to promote safe mobility. Cities must
>> interlink a full
>> range of actions that form the big solution.
>>
>> *Anumita Roychowdhury is associate director at Centre for
>> Science and
>> Environment.** Comment at feedback at livemint.com*
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> To search the archives of sustran-discuss visit
>> http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=014715651517519735401:ijjtzwbu_ss
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> If you get sustran-discuss via YAHOOGROUPS, please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss
>> to join the real sustran-discuss and get full membership
>> rights.
>>
>> ================================================================
>> SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of
>> people-centred, equitable and sustainable transport with a
>> focus on developing countries (the 'Global South').
>>
>>      
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> To search the archives of sustran-discuss visit
> http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=014715651517519735401:ijjtzwbu_ss
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> If you get sustran-discuss via YAHOOGROUPS, please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss to join the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights.
>
> ================================================================
> SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred, equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing countries (the 'Global South').


-- 

Todd Edelman
Green Idea Factory,
a member of the OPENbike team

Mobile: ++49(0)162 814 4081
Immobile: ++49(0)30 7554 0001

edelman at greenidea.eu
www.greenidea.eu
todd at openbike.se
www.openbike.se

Skype: toddedelman

Urbanstr. 45
10967 Berlin
Germany

***

OPENbike - Share the Perfect Fit!