[sustran] IRF says misinterpretation in HT Story on cycle tracks

[Anvita Arora]

Dear All,
I forward the letter by IRF to HT reporter.
Both officials from the IRF and UTTIPEC have now issued letters to Hindustan
Times for the story saying that it is a misquote of statements. As Romi had
pointed out that they have interpreted "need-based" cycle tracks on the less
than 30 m right of way roads to "not-needed" and taken as "removal".
Whoever maybe at fault, what this incident shows that the media is clearly
representing the car users and will pick up any excuse to ensure that their
space on the roads is not taken up by other modes like cyclists. This echoes
the campaign against the Delhi BRT that the media had created in 2007.
Possibly the lesson for us is that camaigning for cycle inclusive planning
still needs to be done in an activist mode with the message that cycing
facilities need to be on ALL roads and is mandatory. Rational planning terms
like "need-based" cycle tracks and options like painted lines etc only give
ammunition to remove cycle tracks.
We are just finalizing a manual on "Cycling Inclusive Planning in the Indian
Subcontinent" which deals with these discussions of where do we need
segregated tracks, where painted lines and where traffic calming considering
the Indian roads and conditions. But we all know that the media doesn't read
manuals and reporters mostly suffer from problems of attention deficit. So,
I repeat, that our message cannot be diluted and we have to demand cycling
facilities on all roads.

Best regards
Anvita

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Varinder Arora <varinderkarora at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:15 PM
Subject: clarification on Mr K.K.Kapila's (Chairman IRF) quote
misinterpretation in HT Story on cycle tracks .
To: subhendu.ray at gmail.com, subhendu.ray at hindustantimes.com
Cc: romionly at gmail.com, qadeeroy at gmail.com, Ashok Bhattacharjee <
diruttipec at gmail.com>, madhukishwar at csds.in, asthanaprabhakar at gmail.com,
geetamt at gmail.com, splcommtpt at nic.in, Nippo <nipesh.ar at gmail.com>,
ud-spa-09 at googlegroups.com, patwardhan.sujit at gmail.com, Rajendra Ravi <
rajendra_ravi at idsindia.net>, Anvita Arora <anvitaa at gmail.com>, Dinesh Mohan
<dmohan at cbme.iitd.ernet.in>, sujit at parisar.org, info at irfnet.org,
info at irfnet.eu, info at irfnews.org




Dear Subhendu,

This refers to your HT story "Cycle Tracks may be on the  way out"  dated
November 9, 2010  where Mr K.K. Kapila's,(Chairman, International Road
Federation)  statement has been misinterpreted .

The HT reporter had called up saying that UTTIPEC is planning to propose to
"replace" or make need based several  cycle tracks on 30 meter width roads,

So any person would appreciate such a move and no where Mr Kapila has said
that the  cycle tracks should be removed from anywhere .

IRF has already taken up the cause for safety of  two wheeler and cyclists
with Ministry of Road Transport and Highways as well as Ministry of
Industries.

IRF has also taken up a National project on safety for cyclists with help of
bicycle manufacturers and  two wheelers. The trials for the project are on
for last one month.

IRF is the last body to appreciate removal of cycle tracks rather it has
been promoting construction of more cycle tracks in the capital and other
metro cities.


With best regards


Varinder K Arora
PRO, IRF, India
09811153833
varinderkarora at gmail.com



-- 
Anvita Arora, PhD
Transport Planner,
Resident Representative, Interface for Cycling Expertise (I-CE), Netherlands
CEO, Innovative Transport Solutions (iTrans) Pvt. Ltd., TBIU, IIT, Delhi
email: anvitaa at gmail.com