[sustran] Re: [SUSTRAN] Re: Tata Nano: Criminalizing Mobility orMobilizing Crime

Lee Schipper schipper at wri.org
Thu Jan 24 06:03:28 JST 2008


Setty makes a fair point, but that's just the dilemma facing transport
everywhere. The time-space geographer Waerneryd used the problem in the
early 1970s -- only a car will connect all the tasks for those parents.

The problem is that Waerneryd worked in Sweden, where even in the 1970s
the kinds of congestion  Bangalore and other Indian cities have NOW was
unknown (and is still pretty mild). So an additional driver in Sweden
could pretty much count on connecting more dots with a car than with
collective transport. 

Steven Tyler studied Knivsta, a town n. of Stockholm on the main
railroad line and road to Uppsala. He wondered why so many people drove
to work? There were two answer -- one, tax policy permitted deduction
for commuting expenses, and a car could be deducted if it saved 1/2
hour, and two, far more jobs were accessible by car than by mass transit
within a given amount of driving time.  In the early 1970s Sweden had
the highest car ownership in Europe -- but it lost that lead to Germany,
Italy, and now even other countries. One reason may be the good mass
transit, i.e., that the number of people who really save money and time
driving to work maxed out. Local authorities are trying to do that all
over Scandinavia to reduce driving. Who is doing that in India, China,
or the US today?

Sweden also pioneered green taxes. If you bought a "standard" car in the
1990s you paid somewhat higher purchase taxes than if you bought one
that satisfied California's more demanding pollution norms. This eased
in a rapid transition away from leaded fuel (which cost more than
unleaded from the mid 1980s) and from "high" sulfur diesel (high
compared to the present <15 ppm in Sweden today, but well below Indian
levels!).  

Now let's consider an Indian city. The roads are already choked - some
will save time as above if they now drive to where they have to go. But
how much time (and pollution) will everyone else suffer? Is the balance
the same as in Sweden (or if you will, the US, where the AVERAGE commute
is still under 25 minutes, albeit with a clear tail)? Stockholm recently
opted for a congesting charging scheme to try to ration  better the
available space on the limited number of bridges and other ways into
town. Could or should Indian cities do the same? Should they start NOW
before decisions about car ownership and housing are made, or after, as
Stockholm did? Congestion charging may not be the ideal mechanism for
India, but it has helped  achieve a better balance on crowded roads in
Stockholm, London, and for many years Singapore

So Setty, the question is not whether the family you describe is right
or wrong, rather, what policy package would put them in a position to
consider ALL costs not just their own gains in time? And what mechanisms
are appropriate for ALL cities to achieve a better balance between
individual and collective traffic? It seems to me that if motorizing
cities act first to strengthen collective transport, strengthen and
enforce emissions and fuel norms, and establish a clear tradition that
everyone pays for the costs he/she imposes on others (congestion, noise,
air pollution etc)

I wish I knew the answer. Unfortunately even the so called leader of the
Free Market, the US, can't seem to wrap its mind around the Swedish
approach. Which one will India choose?

Lee Schipper
EMBARQ Fellow
EMBARQ, the WRI Center for Sustainable Transport
www.embarq.wri.org
and
Visiting Scholar
UC Transportation Center
Berkeley CA USA www.uctc.net
skype: mrmeter
+1 510 642 6889
Cell +1 202 262 7476
 

-----Original Message-----
From: sustran-discuss-bounces+schipper=wri.org at list.jca.apc.org
[mailto:sustran-discuss-bounces+schipper=wri.org at list.jca.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Pendakur
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:16 AM
To: sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org
Subject: [sustran] Re: [SUSTRAN] Re: Tata Nano: Criminalizing Mobility
orMobilizing Crime

It would be good if all the people who have sent in discussions on the
"smart Tata car", to place themselves in the position of a person, say
in Bangalore (india), who has two children and a spouse, all going to
different destinations.  Even though the bus system is ok in Banaglore,
compared to other cities in India, it would take this family a great
deal of time and money to reach their destinations,.  In addition, all
four destinations (2 schools and 2 work places) are farther apart.  This
smart car is a boon to this family.  It will cut their travel time in
half and provide a safer vehicle than the motor cycle they use now.

Eloquence is good (criminalizing mobility) but empty eloquence from a
distance is rarely of any significance.

Cheers.

Setty
Dr. V. Setty Pendakur
Professor Emeritus, University of BC
Honorary Professor, China National Academy of Sciences; Director, ITDP
(NY) & Secretary, ABE90-TRB

President, Pacific Policy and Planning Associates
702- 1099 Marinaside Cresecent, Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 2Z3
604-263-3576; Fax: 604-263-6493


-----Original Message-----
From:
sustran-discuss-bounces+pendakur=interchange.ubc.ca at list.jca.apc.org
[mailto:sustran-discuss-bounces+pendakur=interchange.ubc.ca at list.jca.apc
.org
] On Behalf Of Walter Hook
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 9:45 AM
To: edelman at greenidea.eu
Cc: sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org
Subject: [sustran] Re: Tata Nano: Criminalizing Mobility or Mobilizing
Crime

Todd

People in developing countries still face significant mobility
constraints, and for them low cost vehicles are a boon. A motorbike, a
motorized three wheeler, a car, these things may be an economic lifeline
to a relatively poor family.  

Ownership without use poses relatively minor social problems, so what is
the problem with a cheap car?  The social problems are primarily
associated with use, so it is primarily the cost of the use of vehicles
that needs to be increased to reflect the true social cost, not the
ownership of the vehicle.

The optimal cost of the car is the cost it takes to make a car someone
wants safely that meets all the regulatory requirements.  With China and
India becoming big producers and mechanization proceeding apace, the
price of motor vehicles in real terms is likely to fall over time.  All
manufactured goods fall in price.  Falling consumer prices are in
general a sign of progress.  Less of society's labor required to produce
the vehicle, leaves money to spend on something else.

However, what is never going to fall in price is the value of downtown
real estate, including the value of road space in desirable locations.
There is only one Greenwich Village in Manhattan, and on streets with
extremely expensive real estate parking is absolutely free.  Of course
the result is that there is virtually no parking available, and most of
this valuable real estate ends up being used as a car storage facility
for local residents and shop owners.  This is completely crazy, and
people are slowly waking up to this madness. 

What is also unlikely to fall in price is oil.  Hence, over time the use
of vehicles is going to increase in price, and the cost of ownership
decrease in relative terms.  

It is not impossible to imagine that at some point cars, like cell
phones, will be practically given away for free in order to sell much
more expensive services related to them, like parking, oil, whatever.
With Zip Car, you don't need to own the vehicle at all, you are mainly
paying for the garaging and gasoline and vehicle maintenance.  The
replacement cost of the vehicle is relatively minor.  One can imagine
that you could pay so much for a parking slot in a garage that the
garage eventually will throw in the use of the car for free.  

It seems to me an exercise in futility and risks sounding elitist to
complain about the low cost of vehicles when the social problem lies
elsewhere.

w
-----Original Message-----
From: sustran-discuss-bounces+whook=itdp.org at list.jca.apc.org
[mailto:sustran-discuss-bounces+whook=itdp.org at list.jca.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Todd Edelman, Green Idea Factory
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:33 PM
Cc: sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org
Subject: [sustran] Re: Tata Nano: Criminalizing Mobility or Mobilizing
Crime

Hi Walter,

Walter Hook wrote:
> I was interviewed by a few reporters on this, and I said I didn't 
> think
that
> the low cost of the vehicle was in and of itself a problem.
OK
>   If the vehicle
> is not fully road worthy, crash worthy, or up to minimum tailpipe 
> emission standards, those are serious social problems.
YES
>   Other than this, it is great
> if the cost of vehicles goes down.
WHY?
>   However, it will create pressure on the governments to charge prices

> that more accurately reflect the full social cost of the use of the 
> vehicle, through coherent parking charges and road user charges.
COULD you explain this, please?

>  Cheap cars do not generate any more congestion than expensive
> ones.  I suppose this was not what they wanted to hear, so maybe it
wasn't
> picked up. 
>   
THANKS,
T



> -----Original Message-----
> From: sustran-discuss-bounces+whook=itdp.org at list.jca.apc.org
> [mailto:sustran-discuss-bounces+whook=itdp.org at list.jca.apc.org] On
Behalf
> Of Lee Schipper
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 3:21 PM
> To: bruun at seas.upenn.edu; sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org
> Subject: [sustran] Re: Tata Nano: Criminalizing Mobility or Mobilizing
Crime
>
>  WE had a discussion of these issues on "On Point" , a US radio show,
> today which you
> Can hear at wbur.org. Email me if you have problems as I know where
> there is an mp3 of the 50 minute broadcast. Anumita Roychowdry of CSE
> and a Professor from MIT were also on the show and there were call ins
> as well.
>
> lee
>
>
> Lee Schipper
> EMBARQ Fellow
> EMBARQ, the WRI Center for Sustainable Transport
> www.embarq.wri.org
> and
> Visiting Scholar
> UC Transportation Center
> Berkeley CA USA www.uctc.net
> skype: mrmeter
> +1 510 642 6889
> Cell +1 202 262 7476
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sustran-discuss-bounces+schipper=wri.org at list.jca.apc.org
> [mailto:sustran-discuss-bounces+schipper=wri.org at list.jca.apc.org] On
> Behalf Of bruun at seas.upenn.edu
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:17 PM
> To: sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org
> Subject: [sustran] Re: Tata Nano: Criminalizing Mobility or Mobilizing
> Crime
>
> Hassaan
>
> The reason people are alarmed is because they can see where this is
> going -- in the wrong direction against sustainable development and
> livable cities. But mostly the discussion in the press has been about
> fuel consumption, greenhouse gasses, and air pollution.
>
> One thing that has been under-reported is the consequences to
> pedestrians and biyclists. Far more are killed than motorists
themselves
> in India. An increase in cars will increase the death and maiming to
> them far more than to motorists. But being piles of junk built to a
very
> lax safety standard, these TATAs will no doubt be killing a lot of
their
> users as well, and bring the ratio up.
>
> This negative impact will only be temporary. One of the things people
> haven't talked about in the press at all, as this is not as well
known,
> is the sheer physical impossibility of accommodating so many cars.
> Within a short period of time, all the parking and road space within
> many cities will be used up and traffic will move to slowly to cause
> many serious accidents. Look at Chinese cities already, with only 2.5
> percent auto ownership.
>
> On the other hand, how can this be stopped? You are certainly right
that
> the regulatory oversight is not yet in place. But if India's
government
> works even remotely like the US government, the auto interests will be
> working behind the scenes to slow this oversight down as much as
> possible. If the rich are allowed to drive around, why can't other
> people? Until some restraints are put on cars in general, it would be
> class warfare to only ban these small cheap cars.
>
> Eric Bruun
>
>
>
>
> Quoting Hassaan Ghazali <hghazali at gmail.com>:
>
>   
>> Friends,
>>
>> There was a time when a Model T rolled off the Ford assembly line 
>> every few seconds. I do believe that was probably the most exciting 
>> and the most positive time for the US economy. Now, it seems Tata's 
>> mobility breakthrough has everyone on the edge and I am surprised to 
>> see so many negative sentiments being expressed within South Asia. I 
>> don't remember so many issues abounding when Daimler-Chrysler's Smart

>> car came out. Regardless of the fact that the Smart car was probably 
>> one major reason for the eventual divorce between Daimler and 
>> Chrysler, how does the economic and social disparity between the 
>> developed and developing world create the context to despise such an
>>     
> incredible product?
>   
>> Shall we all begin by shunning technology which aims to empower the 
>> masses or shall we encourage its uptake and ensure that the whole 
>> suite of technological constructs (institutions, policies, regulatory

>> oversight,
>> etc.) are also provided.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hassaan
>>
>>
>> --
>> Institutional Development Specialist
>> Urban Sector Policy and Management Unit (The Urban Unit) Planning & 
>> Development Department, Government of the Punjab
>>
>> A: 4-B Lytton Road, Lahore, Pakistan
>> T: 9213579-84 (Ext.116)
>> F: 9213585
>> M: 0345 455 6016
>> Skype: halgazel
>> http://hghazali.googlepages.com
>>
>> *When conditions are right, everything will go wrong*
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via
>>     
> YAHOOGROUPS.
>   
>> Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss
>>  to join the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights.  
>> The  yahoogroups version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot 
>> post  to the real sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes

>> it  seem like you can). Apologies for the confusing arrangement.
>>
>> ================================================================
>> SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred,

>> equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing   
>> countries (the 'Global South').
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via
> YAHOOGROUPS. 
>
> Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss
to
> join the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights. The
> yahoogroups version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post
to
> the real sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes it seem
> like you can). Apologies for the confusing arrangement.
>
> ================================================================
> SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred,
> equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing
countries
> (the 'Global South'). 
> -------------------------------------------------------- 
> IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via
> YAHOOGROUPS. 
>
> Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss
to
join
> the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights. The
yahoogroups
> version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post to the real
> sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes it seem like you
can).
> Apologies for the confusing arrangement.
>
> ================================================================
> SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred,
> equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing
countries
> (the 'Global South'). 
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------- 
> IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via
YAHOOGROUPS. 
>
> Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss
to
join the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights. The
yahoogroups version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post to
the
real sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes it seem like
you
can). Apologies for the confusing arrangement.
>
> ================================================================
> SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred,
equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing countries
(the 'Global South'). 
>
>   


-- 
--------------------------------------------

Todd Edelman
Director
Green Idea Factory

Korunni 72
CZ-10100 Praha 10
Czech Republic

Skype: toddedelman
++420 605 915 970
++420 222 517 832

edelman at greenidea.eu
http://greenideafactory.blogspot.com/
www.flickr.com/photos/edelman

Green Idea Factory is a member of World Carfree Network
www.worldcarfree.net

CAR is over. If you WANT it.

-------------------------------------------------------- 
IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via
YAHOOGROUPS. 

Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss to
join
the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights. The yahoogroups
version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post to the real
sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes it seem like you
can).
Apologies for the confusing arrangement.

================================================================
SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred,
equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing countries
(the 'Global South'). 



-------------------------------------------------------- 
IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via
YAHOOGROUPS. 

Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss to
join
the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights. The yahoogroups
version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post to the real
sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes it seem like you
can).
Apologies for the confusing arrangement.

================================================================
SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred,
equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing countries
(the 'Global South'). 


-------------------------------------------------------- 
IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via
YAHOOGROUPS. 

Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss to
join the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights. The
yahoogroups version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post to
the real sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes it seem
like you can). Apologies for the confusing arrangement.

================================================================
SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred,
equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing countries
(the 'Global South'). 


More information about the Sustran-discuss mailing list