[sustran] Re: Tata Car and getting our act together

[Lee Schipper]

Let me propose a simple equation -- weight  the benefits of the "Nano" owners (whomever they may turn out to be) against the disbenefits of the large majority of Indians on foot (note I did not say "on the sidewalk"),on pedals, or on two wheelers. Seeing the current onslaught of two wheelers against "foot people" and against each other in India, I have a hard time believing that the benefits will outweight the  disbenefits.
 
If you want to argue that some day a huge percentage of Indians will be driving Nanos, which will somehow mean that foot people are no longer at risk then I would simply argue that Indian cities will have collapsed under the tires of cars....
 
Lee Schipper
EMBARQ, the WRI Center for Sustainable Transport
www.embarq.wri.org
>From Oct 1, Visiting Scholar, 
UC Transportation Center
UC Berkeley, CA 
www.uctc.net
510 642 6889
202 262 7476

________________________________

From: sustran-discuss-bounces+schipper=wri.org at list.jca.apc.org on behalf of Robert Cowherd
Sent: Fri 1/11/2008 3:40 AM
To: sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org
Subject: [sustran] Tata Car and getting our act together



Despite the thinness of Sharma's laying out of one specious argument after
another, the elitist charge has a history of stopping otherwise well-meaning
and effective people in their tracks. This comes at a great cost. The double
whammie here is how nicely the elitist charge meshes with the
petro-automaker public campaign to extend personal mobility (automobility)
to the developing world as a social justice imperative.

Unfortunately, as in telling Brazil to stop cutting its rainforests, the
elitism charge has teeth. The key is to mobilize the measures to restrict
auto use, not necessarily ownership (see Singapore), in ways that benefit
the poor first (congestion pricing funding bus-only right of ways, etc.).

The Tata car makes it clearer than even it has been that the reasons for the
developed west to get its act together is quickly becoming less about
reducing our direct global impact and more about our effectiveness in
presenting a model for India, China, Indonesia and the rest of the
developing world before our cultural appeal and thus our capacity to lead
fades to black.

Robert Cowherd, PhD, Associate Professor of Architecture
Wentworth Institute of Technology 550 Huntington Ave. Boston, MA 02115 USA
cowherdr at wit.edu; +1 617 989-4453



On 1/10/08 11:53 PM, "Sunny" <sunny.enie at gmail.com> wrote:

> Why critics of the Tata small car are barking up the wrong tree news
> Vivek Sharma
> 10 January 2008
>
> Those who criticise the Tata small car are barking up the wrong tree and
> some of their arguments are elitist and discriminatory.
>

--------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via YAHOOGROUPS.

Please go to http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss to join the real sustran-discuss and get full membership rights. The yahoogroups version is only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post to the real sustran-discuss (even if the yahoogroups site makes it seem like you can). Apologies for the confusing arrangement.

================================================================
SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion of people-centred, equitable and sustainable transport with a focus on developing countries (the 'Global South').