[sustran] The Potential of Bike-sharing in Lesser-developed Countries

eric.britton eric.britton at ecoplan.org
Mon Feb 4 17:56:45 JST 2008


Thanks to Paul DeMaio, taken from http://bike-sharing.blogspot.com/ 

 

 


The
<http://bike-sharing.blogspot.com/2008/02/potential-of-bike-sharing-in-lesse
r.html>  Potential of Bike-sharing in Lesser-developed Countries 


 
<http://bp0.blogger.com/_-OPNDCJtErg/R6Pk4NCnk_I/AAAAAAAAAI8/Nywvxc3erpk/s16
00-h/World+Map.gif>
http://bp0.blogger.com/_-OPNDCJtErg/R6Pk4NCnk_I/AAAAAAAAAI8/Nywvxc3erpk/s400
/World+Map.gif
What is the potential of bike-sharing in lesser-developed countries? In many
ways, the lesser- and greater-developed countries could approach
bike-sharing in the same way. Most American cities as well as many European
cities who are examining or have implemented bike-sharing programs have or
had low bike mode share before bike-sharing. A sample of a few cities, such
as Washington, D.C. with a bike commute mode share of about 1.75%, Seattle
at 1.5%, and San Francisco at 0.95%, all have desires for bike-sharing. Many
European cities with bike-sharing programs also had low bike mode shares
before they launched, including Paris (1.6%) and Lyon (less than 1%). I
would hazard a guess that lesser-developed countries would benefit equally
from bike-sharing programs as long as equal public commitments were made
into improving cycle facilities as has generally been the case in Europe.

Bike-sharing has drawn huge media attention in locations where it has been
implemented and substantial interest elsewhere from what I've heard and
seen. A recent advocacy effort in Philadelphia drew 400 citizens interested
in the possibilities of a bike-sharing program in their city. The mayor was
so impressed with the turn-out that a serious effort is now underway to
examine the issue. Bike-sharing has created a virtuous cycle (pardon the
pun) in increasing private bike use too. As bike-sharing develops a
constituency user group, maybe then citizens in cities of lesser-developed
countries would have an attachment to the program and to an improvement in
their city's bike facilities. A local advocacy group need not be present to
usher in a bike-sharing program but rather a mayor, elected official,
government employee, or simply an interested citizen with a vision. This has
been the case with Paris Mayor Delanoe and I'm seeing it happen in the U.S.
too. I imagine the same could be true of bike-sharing programs to be
implemented in lesser-developed countries.

It's the old chicken and egg issue, with which came first, the cyclist or
the cycle track? With bike-sharing maybe it doesn't matter as it creates
both.

 



More information about the Sustran-discuss mailing list