[sustran] Re: Fwd: Event: Getting the climate right for transport
Todd Alexander Litman
litman at vtpi.org
Tue Dec 4 05:42:19 JST 2007
Last week I attended the National Renewable
Energy Laboratory (NREL) Energy Analysis Forum in
Golden, Colorado
(http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/news.html ), where
leading North American energy analysts shared the
latest thinking concerning greenhouse gas
emission reduction strategies and legislation,
much of which involves emission cap and trade
programs
(http://www.rff.org/rff/News/Releases/2007Releases/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=31222
). Similarly, a recent report by McKinsey,
"Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: How Much
At What Cost"
(http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/ccsi/greenhousegas.asp
) estimates the economic costs of achieving emission reduction targets.
Virtually all these analyses are biased against
mobility management (various strategies that
increase transport system efficiency by improving
mobility options, encouraging use of more
efficient modes, and reducing the need to travel), for the following reasons:
* Co-benefits are ignored. Current analysis gives
virtually no consideration to benefits such as
reduced traffic congestion, road and parking cost
savings, consumer savings, reduced traffic risk,
improved mobility for non-drivers, and improved
public health, although these benefits are often
larger in total value than emission reduction
benefits (see http://www.vtpi.org/tdm and
www.ap-net.org/docs/16th_seminar/huizenga_caiasia_special.pdf ).
* Current analysis generally ignores the
additional external costs that result when
increased vehicle fuel efficiency and subsidized
alternative fuels stimulates additional vehicle
travel, called a "rebound effect" (see
http://www.vtpi.org/cafe.pdf and
http://www.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-04-53.pdf ).
* Mobility management emission reductions are
considered difficult to predict. Although case
studies and models are available for many of
these strategies (see for example, case studies
in http://www.vtpi.org/tdm and the TRIMMS Model
at http://www.nctr.usf.edu/abstracts/abs77704.htm
), such models are not widely available or designed for energy planning.
* Mobility management programs are considered
difficult to implement. Such programs often
involve multiple stakeholders, such as regional
and local governments, employers and developers,
and various special interest groups. Even PAYD, a
relatively simple strategy, requires cooperation
of insurance regulators, insurance companies, and
various special interest groups. As a result,
they tend to seem difficult and risky compared
with other emission reduction strategies that
only require changes to utility operations, fuel production or vehicle designs.
* Analysis often assume that current transport
patterns are economically optimal and any
reduction in vehicle travel harms consumers and
the economy. This ignores various market
distortions that stimulate motor vehicle travel,
and the benefits to consumers and the economy of
many mobility management strategies
(<http://www.vtpi.org/distortions_BPJ.pdf>www.vtpi.org/distortions_BPJ.pdf
). With improved travel options and efficient
incentives travel reductions reflect low-value
vehicle-miles that consumers willingly forego in
exchange for cost savings. In a more optimal
market, with efficient road, parking and vehicle
insurance pricing, and more optimal planning
practices, motorists would drive significantly
less and be better off overall (http://www.vtpi.org/sotpm.pdf ).
Described differently, there are two general
approaches to reducing transportation emissions:
reduce emission rates per vehicle-kilometer or
reduce total vehicle-travel. The first generally
seems easier, because it simply requires changing
fuels or vehicle design, but, if done correctly,
the second provides far more total benefits. As a
result, significant emission reductions can be
achieved with negative costs (they provide net economic benefits).
Due to these factors, currently proposed emission
reduction programs will not implement mobility
management as much as optimal and so will fail to
achieve other important benefits such as
congestion reductions, crash reductions, consumer
savings and equity objectives
(http://www.vtpi.org/wwclimate.pdf ). A truly
sustainable transportation system requires more
than simply reducing consumption of fossil fuels,
it requires creating a more efficient
transportation system. It will be up to those of
us who understand the wider value of mobility
management to educate decision makers about their
full benefits and overcome barriers, so they can
be implemented as much as justified.
Please let me know if you have comments or questions.
Best wishes,
-Todd Litman
At 11:06 PM 12/1/2007, Paul Barter wrote:
>Trying to forward this message which the list blocked for some reason.
>Paul
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: Carlosfelipe Pardo <carlosfpardo at gmail.com>
>To: Global 'South' Sustainable Transport <sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org>
>Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:05:30 -0500
>Subject: Event: Getting the climate right for transport
> Transport side event at COP 13, Bali Indonesia
>Organized by TRL/GTZ, UITP, UIC, ITPS
>
>The German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) will host a side event titled "Getting
>the climate right for transport" at the United Nations Climate Change
>Conference (COP 13) in Bali. The event will be in cooperation with the
>Transport Research Laboratory (UK), UITP, UIC and Institution for Transport
>Policy Studies (Japan).
>
>The event will discuss future pathways to a more sustainable transport
>system along with options for decision-makers to integrate climate change
>mitigation measures into the transport sector.
>
>The event will take place on 7th and 8th December, 2007 from 1 to 3 pm in
>the Tidal Room at the Grand Hyatt Hotel.
>
>The event will combine practical as well as methodological approaches with
>actual experience on sustainable transportation. The draft program is on our
>SUTP website at www.sutp.org .
>
>At this event Mr. Manfred Breithaupt (GTZ) and Mr. Holger Dalkmann (TRL)
>will present the new sourcebook module titled "Transport and Climate
>Change", which is the latest publication in the GTZ Sustainable Urban
>Transport series, and discuss available instruments to reduce carbon dioxide
>emissions in the transport sector.
>
>The module summarises the challenges that climate change mitigation has to
>face in the transport sector and presents the major options and instruments
>available to deal with them. The module also explains the various
>sustainable transport policy and planning options and sketches out their
>potential for reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
>With the new module, the GTZ Sustainable Urban Transport Sourcebook now has
>26 modules focussing on various issues of transportation. All the modules
>are available to download from the SUTP websites at no cost (
>http://www.sutp.org and http://www.sutp.cn for Chinese users).
>
>--
>Carlosfelipe Pardo
>Coordinador de Proyecto- Project Coordinator
>GTZ - Proyecto de Transporte Sostenible (SUTP, SUTP-LAC)
>Cl 93A # 14-17 of 708
>Bogotá D.C., Colombia
>Tel/fax: +57 (1) 236 2309 Mobile: +57 (3) 15 296 0662
>carlos.pardo at sutp.org www.sutp.org
>--------------------------------------------------------
>IMPORTANT NOTE to everyone who gets sustran-discuss messages via YAHOOGROUPS.
>
>Please go to
>http://list.jca.apc.org/manage/listinfo/sustran-discuss
>to join the real sustran-discuss and get full
>membership rights. The yahoogroups version is
>only a mirror and 'members' there cannot post to
>the real sustran-discuss (even if the
>yahoogroups site makes it seem like you can).
>Apologies for the confusing arrangement.
>
>================================================================
>SUSTRAN-DISCUSS is a forum devoted to discussion
>of people-centred, equitable and sustainable
>transport with a focus on developing countries (the 'Global South').
Sincerely,
Todd Alexander Litman
Victoria Transport Policy Institute (www.vtpi.org)
litman at vtpi.org
Phone & Fax 250-360-1560
1250 Rudlin Street, Victoria, BC, V8V 3R7, CANADA
Efficiency - Equity - Clarity
More information about the Sustran-discuss
mailing list