[sustran] Re: Beijing's pollution not just an 'official' problem

etts at indigo.ie etts at indigo.ie
Wed May 24 18:57:49 JST 2006


I think it is significant that this appeared as an opinion in China Daily.
That doesn't necessarily mean that all the desired change will come, but it
is a strong signal. Since last year there has been an official policy to
prioritise public transport, and of course this needs to be matched by a
policy to manage the urban space and car use. 

The one surprising thing is that there is no mention of the newly-opened
BRT which is carrying over 80,000 persons per day on average, and they have
more lines underway.

With best wishes, 


Brendan Finn.

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Eric.Britton eric.britton at ecoplan.org
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 07:48:52 +0200
To: CarFreeCafe at yahoogroups.com, sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org,
emoore at chinadaily.com.cn, editorial at chinadaily.com.cn
Subject: [sustran] Beijing's pollution not just an 'official' problem


Beijing's pollution not just an 'official' problem
By Emma Moore (chinadaily.com.cn)
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2006-05/22/content_596560.htm
Updated: 2006-05-22 09:10 

 

It doesn't take a slew of complex statistics and reports to convince
Beijingers that their city has a problem with air pollution. Just
stepping outside and taking a couple of deep breaths is proof enough of
the severity of the pollution levels in China's capital. 

Much of the city's haze is caused by dust whipped up from construction
sites and the Gobi Desert. But the real health dangers come from toxic
vehicle emissions and that's something all Beijing residents need to
take responsibility for. 

Satellite images taken by the European Space Agency in 2005 show Beijing
and the surrounding north-east China region has the world's worst
nitrogen dioxide pollution. This noxious heavy gas can cause potentially
deadly lung damage and respiratory problems. Combined with air
particles, it often blankets the city in a brownish pall. Looking down
on this murky smog from my office window is enough to make me want to
hold my breath all day. 

Once internationally famous as the city of bicycles, Beijing currently
has over 2.6 million motor vehicles with a further 1,000 plus hitting
the streets daily. It seems like everyone in the city now aspires to own
a car. And why shouldn't the liberals might argue. But the thought of
all the adults among Beijing's ever-growing 15 million plus population
driving a car each is mind-boggling. Already the city's roads are
clearly overcrowded and at rush hour, the city seems to be choking to
death in some traffic hotspots. The clamor of drivers honking their
horns impatiently, worn brakes screeching, engines revving and bicycle
bells ringing incessantly is enough to make even the most serene
person's blood pressure lurch. 

City authorities are now taking decisive steps to prevent the looming
environmental and public health disaster. The stunted two-line subway
network is being rapidly expanded, highway toll systems are being
upgraded and extended, vehicle emission standards are being more
rigorously enforced and efforts are being made to limit the number of
taxis prowling the city streets. It sometimes seems that too little is
being done almost too late; and there remains much more to be done, but
the right noises are being made in planning offices. 

Now it's up to Beijingers to do their part to save themselves and their
city. 

Beijing already promotes International Car Free Day on September 22, but
one day of reduced exhaust emissions out of every 365 is a mere token
gesture in the face of China's skyrocketing pollution levels. 

Du Shaozhong, deputy director of the Beijing Environment Protection
Bureau, is setting a good example by welcoming a new 'blue skies'
campaign. The campaign aims to reduce private vehicle use and encourage
walking by persuading drivers to give up their cars for one day a month.
To date, 200,000 vehicle owners from 79 car clubs have voiced their
support for the movement. That's a good start, but commitment is needed
from many more drivers if any real impact is to be made. 

What I don't understand is that if drivers are able to walk to work one
day a month, what prevents them from walking one day a week or even
every single day? Buying a car may be expensive but it doesn't cost
owners their legs! The trouble with car ownership is that it inevitably
leads to laziness. 

One of the sponsors of the 'blue skies' campaign, Wu Zhonghua, chairman
of Beijing's Sohu Car Club sums up the situation succinctly: "We cannot
control the weather, but we can control our wheels." We can also control
our natural inclination to avoid physical effort. 

Walking or riding a bicycle around town everyday is often looked down on
as lower class and unsophisticated by ambitious city types. But in most
developed countries many people now choose to walk or cycle whenever
possible and save their cars for trips too long to walk. The benefits of
not driving walkable distances are numerous and far-reaching. On a
personal level, regular exercise helps with weight loss and control;
improves fitness; reduces stress, and of course saves money on petrol
and parking. Leaving your car at home helps minimize air and noise
pollution, traffic accidents, oil consumption, road repairs and
beautifies cities. 

The Beijing Environment Protection Bureau reported 17 days of level four
or five (severe) air pollution in the first quarter of 2006, compared to
only nine days in all of 2005, and just 60 blue-sky days - 16 less than
the same period last year. It seems that things are getting worse before
they will get better. 

I hope Beijingers will bear this in mind and remember the advantages of
walking next time they're hunting for their car keys.

 



--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .




More information about the Sustran-discuss mailing list