[sustran] Transport in cities: Why are we doing so poorly?

[Eric.Britton]

-----Original Message-----
From: John Whitelegg [mailto:John.Whitelegg at phonecoop.coop] 
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:42 PM
To: Eric.Britton; WorldCarShare at yahoogroups.com;
NewMobilityCafe at yahoogroups.com
Cc: John.Holtzclaw at sierraclub.org
Subject: Re: Transport in cities: Why are we doing so poorly? 

 

Eric,

 

Your comments are "spot on" but the situation is even worse.  When i
worked in China last year the Chinese experts constantly looked to the
US for guidance.  It slowly dawned on me that this was quite simple.
All the English speaking (very) senior transport experts, engineers and
politicians were educated at US graduate school and they buy into this.
That is why Beijing will have 10 ring roads (up from 5) in the next few
years

 

plus ca change

 

 

John

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Eric.Britton <mailto:eric.britton at ecoplan.org>  

To: WorldCarShare at yahoogroups.com ; NewMobilityCafe at yahoogroups.com 

Cc: 'John.Whitelegg' <mailto:John.Whitelegg at phonecoop.coop>  ;
John.Holtzclaw at sierraclub.org 

Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:55 AM

Subject: Transport in cities: Why are we doing so poorly? 

 

Subject: Transport in cities: Why are we so desperately off target?
Doing so poorly in the States?  (And everywhere else in the world where
our examples and perspectives spill over)

 

"Critical Issues in Transportation", Transportation Research Board,
Washington D.C., 2006. www.trb.org (report attached)

 

This much ballyhooed report of the US Transportation Research Board
prepared by some of the most brilliant thinkers and practitioners in the
United States under the title "Critical Issues in Transportation" just
slipped under the door here. Hmm. 

 

I have been looking at policy and practice in our sector for quite some
time, and try hard to follow the main lines of developments and thinking
to the extent possible around the world. Which means I read quite a lot.
But through it all I continue to be puzzled as to why in the States in
particular we seem to be so far off target when it comes to transport in
cities with the generally pretty grotesque results that we have, whether
from the vantage of social equity, economics or sheer systemic
(in-)efficiency.  As I read through this report and its selected target
areas and recommendations, it suddenly become very clear to me what the
basic problem is. 

 

What we have here are the collected group thoughts of a selection of
America's leading 'transportation experts', strong as anyone in the
world in engineering and construction in all the basic modal areas to
which they give attention- but have a closer look. There is not a single
meaningful point made about what brings all of us here together: the
fundamentals of how people get around and access what they need in
cities.  Which means to me that this piece, useful as it surely is in
its overall domain, has all of the relevance to us as a book of recipes
explaining how we prepare deep fried foods in Mississippi.

 

Worse. Since it carries with it a title and a whole series of
implications that this is the way you should "do" transportation -
implicitly by title anywhere, cities included - it creates and
reinforces the basic mindset that is 100% central to the problems we are
facing and trying to resolve in cities today. In summary: build your way
out of the problems.  Dig your way out of the hole.

 

Is the altogether incorrect? Unfair? Useless as an observation?

 

I guess that is why we try to call it "New Mobility" and not
"transportation".  We are trying to draw a clear line between these two
markedly different worlds of policy and practice. Otherwise . . . 

 

Eric Britton .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.jca.apc.org/public/sustran-discuss/attachments/20060612/d945c06b/attachment.html