[sustran] Re: Green activist slams government's teleworking policy

[Carlos Felipe Pardo]

Other than that, I think telecommuting may have a "psychological"
downside- or beneficial aspects. I explain myself:

Telecommuters may not in touch with any other people in a long time,
since they are "stuck" at home working by themselves. On the other hand,
they may spend more time with their family (if they have any wife or
children). Sometimes we should think of commuting as another way of
knowing the world, and of interacting. 

I think the option should be to promote another kind of mobility:
leisure trips in sustainable modes, while working at home. The hour or
so that people had "available" for their home-work-home trip can be
spent in these leisure activities during the day- walking in a nearby
park, riding a bicycle somewhere, etc. 

Lastly, one or two days of the week should be taken for running errands.
That way, interacting can be solved, congestion may be lowered and
people could improve their life quality.

But maybe this is too much of an illusion. Just thought that another
point of view different from the technical one- thank you Todd- could be
of use in this discussion. Does anyone else have another opinion?


Carlos F. Pardo
cpardo at cable.net.co
(+573) 00 268 1389
(+571) 310 6218
Cr 4 # 66-54
Bogotá- Colombia
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: sustran-discuss-bounces+cpardo=cable.net.co at list.jca.apc.org
[mailto:sustran-discuss-bounces+cpardo=cable.net.co at list.jca.apc.org] En
nombre de Todd Alexander Litman
Enviado el: Viernes, 10 de Diciembre de 2004 09:57 a.m.
Para: sustran-discuss at list.jca.apc.org
Asunto: [sustran] Re: Green activist slams government's teleworking
policy


I think it may be a mistake to overemphasize telework alone as an 
environmental strategy. It certainly provides user benefits by allowing 
people to increase their housing and work location options, and to avoid

some trips, but telework vehicle travel reductions and energy savings
tend 
to be partly offset in the following ways:

· Teleworkers often make additional vehicle trips to run errands that
would 
otherwise have been made during a commute.

·  Employees may use teleworking to move further from their worksite,
for 
example, choosing a home of job in a rural area or another city because 
they know that they only need to commute two or three days a week. In
some 
cases this may encourage more urban sprawl.

· Vehicles not used for commuting may be driven by other household
members.

· Telecommuters may use additional energy for home heating and cooling,
and 
to power electronic equipment.

· Improved telecommunications may increase people’s long-distance 
connections, resulting in more travel. For example, people may make new 
friends through the Internet, and travel more to visit them.


I believe that telework should be supported as a transportation option,
but 
to significantly reduce external costs such as congestion, energy 
consumption and pollution emissions it must be matched with incentives
to 
reduce driving such as higher fuel taxes, road and parking pricing, and 
distance-based vehicle insurance. Without those incentives, telework may

provide little net benefit to society. For more information see the 
"Telework" chapter of the Online TDM Encyclopedia 
(http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm43.htm).


Best wishes,
-Todd Litman


At 11:44 AM 12/10/2004 +0000, Brendan Finn wrote:

>Teleworking is good for those whose work permits it. I agree that it
has 
>huge potential, especially in countries with a knowledge economy.
>
>A lot of attention has been paid to technical, organisational,
oversight, 
>the arrangements within the home (or local office/desk), and 
>self-management issues i.e. to the work itself.
>
>Two aspects that must also be considered :
>
>a)       The amenities where you are located if it s dead suburbia, you

>don t really have access to very much during the day. After a while,
that 
>s not a lot of fun.
>
>b)       The local transportation system. Public transport is designed
to 
>take you to/from the city centre, along the key arteries. It is
ABSOLUTELY 
>NOT designed for the local run-about journeys of 2-3 km. These are, of 
>course, the typically journeys of home-makers and teleworkers.
>
>I d be very interested to see whether the great ecological savings from

>the commute to downtown or out-of-town cube-farm is offset by a huge 
>amount of local trips, and even if people have found themselves having
to 
>BUY ANOTHER CAR because the local transportation doesn t serve them.
And 
>as we all know, short trips by car are ecologically the worst.
>
>Personal example at this stage. I work from home when I m in Ireland 
>(about half the time, my journey to work distance should make an 
>interesting distribution). I m in the suburbs of Dublin, good bus
service 
>to city centre. But there s nothing for the local trips. What I can do
in 
>5 minutes by car takes about a half-hour on foot, and probably as long 
>when I factor in wait time for the few trips that I could do by bus. I
was 
>spending more time on simple errands (pick up some stationary, computer

>accessories, call to travel agent, plus personal stuff) than I ever did
in 
>the daily commute. In August I finally gave in me, a lifelong public 
>transport advocate and bought a car for the local trips. (The shame,
the 
>shame!).
>
>The answer definitely lies in local flexible transport probably a 
>combination of small bus-based and affordable taxi where we can get 
>low-fare trips in shared vehicles at a level of service that is close
to 
>taxi. Tariffs would be higher than regular bus, but probably not too
much 
>more. Problem is, the city authorities don t want to know (they have 
>lovely highway plans), and both the bus operators and the taxi
operators 
>see it as a threat.
>
>Anyone else got perspectives on this ?
>
>Brendan Finn,
>ETTS, Ireland.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sustran-discuss-bounces+etts=indigo.ie at list.jca.apc.org 
>[mailto:sustran-discuss-bounces+etts=indigo.ie at list.jca.apc.org]On
Behalf 
>Of EcoPlan, Paris
>Sent: 10 December 2004 11:19
>To: XWorkCafe at yahoogroups.com; Sustran-discuss at jca.ax.apc.org
>Cc: j.goodman at forumforthefuture.org.uk
>Subject: [sustran] Green activist slams government's teleworking policy
>
>
>
><mailto:mailroomuk at zdnet.com>Ingrid Marson, ZDNet UK, December 09,
2004, 
>14:25 GMT
>
>More :
>
>1.      Source: 
><http://news.zdnet.co.uk/business/0,39020645,39179945,00.htm>http://new
s.zdnet.co.uk/business/0,39020645,39179945,00.htm
>
>2.      Click 
><http://www.forumforthefuture.org.uk/publications/greenteleworkpub_page
2012.aspx>here 
>to download a free copy of the report.
>
><http://www.forumforthefuture.org.uk/publications/greenteleworkpub_page
2012.aspx>http://www.forumforthefuture.org.uk/publications/greentelework
pub_page2012.aspx
>
>3.      Click here to share your views with group : 
><mailto:XWorkCafe at yahoogroups.com>mailto:XWorkCafe at yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Jonathon Porritt, ex-director of Friends of the Earth, has criticised 
>government reports on teleworking as 'tokenist'
>
>An environmental charity has called on the UK government to revise its 
>policy on teleworking and encourage organisations to use it as part of 
>their environmental policy.
>
>On Wednesday Forum for the Future launched a report on teleworking
which 
>showed how it can be used to reduce the impact that companies have on
the 
>environment and promote sustainable economic development.
>
>Jonathon Porritt, the programme director of the charity, said
government 
>reports on teleworking do not have enough information on how it can be 
>used to improve sustainability. In particular, he criticised a 
><http://news.zdnet.co.uk/business/management/0,39020654,39116058,00.htm
>report 
>produced by the Department for Trade and Industry in 2003, entitled 
>Telework Guidance, and a report by the Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister 
>as respectively having "tokenistic references" and "only the odd 
>tokenistic paragraph" on how businesses should use teleworking to
reduce 
>their environmental impact.
>
>"The government in every level has got to stop pussy-footing around
with 
>sustainable development and embed in its practice," said Porritt.
>
>The charity's report, entitled "Encouraging Green Teleworking", found
that 
>teleworking reduces the need for transport and will therefore
contribute 
>to achieving the government's targets on cutting carbon dioxide
emissions. 
>This is a necessity for the government after its admission on Wednesday

>that it will fail to meet its target on cutting carbon dioxide
emissions 
>by 20 percent by 2010 -- something Porritt didn't duck during his
speech.
>
>"The Prime Minister thinks it's a pretty ambitious goal to achieve its 
>climate change goal of 20 percent," said Porritt. "Well, so do I when I

>look at the government policy."
>
>Sun, which commissioned the charity's report and has had a teleworking 
>policy for five years, initially started its policy on teleworking due
to 
>the problems of traffic congestion during the dot-com boom, according
to 
>Richard Barrington, the head of government affairs at Sun.
>
>"Part of the reason we started doing this was because of congestion,"
said 
>Barrington at the launch event. "We did it purely because people were
just 
>sat in cars on roads. We started with drop-in centres along motorways
-- 
>industrial units where we had scattered technology."
>
>Employees at Sun save two hours commuting time per week through 
>teleworking, according to the report.
>
>Companies can also save money by cutting down on the amount of office 
>space needed. Sun has reduced its office space needs by 25 percent in
the 
>last four years through teleworking, according to the report.
>
>But one environmental downsides of teleworking is that it requires more

>hardware, which requires extra resources to produce and creates more 
>waste. One way to minimise this impact is for companies to use thin 
>clients. Barrington said that a significant number of Sun employees in
the 
>States are already using thin clients at home and it is in the process
of 
>rolling out thin clients to home workers across the UK.
>
>Porritt said that the technology side of teleworking is something which
is 
>likely to attract the government. "There's one bit of the
sustainability 
>that the government should like -- teleworking -- because its
wonderously 
>high-tech and glossy&it's lots of whizzy machines."
>
>One important aspect of implementing teleworking is change management, 
>something which Barrington says Sun is still dealing with.
>
>"We still have a significant percentage of managers who don't like
this, 
>who think 'If I can't see, I can't manage, as I don't know what you're 
>doing,'" said Barrington. "But if you treat people like adults or 
>grown-ups, they tend to respond in kind."
>
>Porritt has had a long involvement with environmental issues in the UK
-- 
>he was the Chairman of the Green Party in the 80s, was the director of 
>Friends of the Earth for a number of years until he left in 1996 to set
up 
>Forum for the Future. He was appointed chairman of the Sustainable 
>Development Commission, the government's independent advisory body on 
>sustainable development, in 2000.
>
>In response to Porritt's comments, the government said that it was
focused 
>on giving companies practical advice on teleworking.
>
>"Of course we recognise there are very important environmental benefits
to 
>teleworking. The guidance last year was intended for practical use for 
>employers and employees," said a DTI spokesman.
>
>
>
>


Sincerely,
Todd Litman, Director
Victoria Transport Policy Institute
"Efficiency - Equity - Clarity"
1250 Rudlin Street
Victoria, BC, V8V 3R7, Canada
Phone & Fax: 250-360-1560
Email: litman at vtpi.org
Website: http://www.vtpi.org