[sustran] Re: Cox & Litman V5 & Bruun
Ryan Russo
rrusso at uclink4.berkeley.edu
Tue Feb 22 12:09:56 JST 2000
the bikeway is an interesting idea. a proforma on costs and maybe
revenues would do your website well if possible.
At 06:35 PM 2/21/00 -0800, you wrote:
>>>>
<excerpt>RE: [sustran] RE: Cox & Litman V5 & Bruun
<bigger>
<color><param>0000,0000,ffff</param> I'm not sure about rail, but if in
the cities or within the city itself if a bus takes more then half an
hour to travel from one point to another( or even within the city and
it's suburbs) , it's usually stuck in a traffic jam. Hence by using a
bike, from my experience, uses fairly less time than buses or private
vehicles(PVs).</color></bigger><color><param>0000,0000,ffff</param>
<bigger> As for rails and there is slightly any excuse for frequently
delay that I would agree with you, Alok Jain. </bigger>
<bigger>Pedal power</bigger>
<bigger>Jimmy</bigger>
<bigger>STEP</bigger>
-----Original Message-----
<bold>From: </bold> Jain Alok [SMTP:ajain at kcrc.com]
<bold>Sent: </bold> Tuesday, February 22, 2000 9:24 AM
<bold>To: </bold> 'sustran-discuss at jca.ax.apc.org'
<bold>Subject: </bold> [sustran] RE: Cox & Litman V5 & Bruun
<bigger>Yeah...but where your commute takes over half an hour by bus or
rail, bike</bigger>
<bigger>cannot substitute. In big cities, I would consider bike's role
more as</bigger>
<bigger>feeder to rail transit or other public transport, with some sort
of</bigger>
<bigger>bike-sharing concept (to use at the destination end).</bigger>
<bigger>Cheers</bigger>
<bigger>Alok Jain</bigger>
<bigger>-----Original Message-----</bigger>
<bigger>From: Milnor H. Senior, III
[<underline><<mailto:msenior at uswest.net>mailto:msenior at uswest.net</underline>]</bigger>
<bigger>Sent: February 22, 2000 5:43 AM</bigger>
<bigger>To: sustran-discuss at jca.ax.apc.org</bigger>
<bigger>Subject: Re: Cox & Litman V5 & Bruun</bigger>
<bigger>In response to the comments made regarding the high cost of
transit products</bigger>
<bigger>the</bigger>
<bigger>issue is a combination of high capital costs to build these rail
products</bigger>
<bigger>plus</bigger>
<bigger>the operating costs which will always exceed fare revenues so
that constant</bigger>
<bigger>operating subsidies are required. I believe the answer lies in
building</bigger>
<bigger>transit</bigger>
<bigger>infrastructure which can be built at an affordable cost and
operated on a</bigger>
<bigger>profit</bigger>
<bigger>making basis by private enterprises so that no public subsidies
are</bigger>
<bigger>required.</bigger>
<bigger>Please examine the web site www.biketrans.com to see an example
of the type</bigger>
<bigger>of</bigger>
<bigger>transit infrastructure which can exceed the carrying capacity of
highway</bigger>
<bigger>lanes,</bigger>
<bigger>most light rail systems and which offers higher speeds in
congested urban</bigger>
<bigger>areas. The System is not only less expensive to build and
operate than</bigger>
<bigger>current</bigger>
<bigger>transit products but the real savings will come from the
improvement in</bigger>
<bigger>public</bigger>
<bigger>health which will result from building exercise back into normal
life</bigger>
<bigger>activities. With cardiovascular disease as the number one cause
of death in</bigger>
<bigger>the</bigger>
<bigger>US and with obesity increasing at an alarming rate it is time to
consider</bigger>
<bigger>making</bigger>
<bigger>changes that benefit both human health and the environment while
lowering</bigger>
<bigger>transportation costs. Bicycling is the most efficient form
of</bigger>
<bigger>transportation</bigger>
<bigger>known and expanding its use within our transportation system
should be used</bigger>
<bigger>to</bigger>
<bigger>solve urban congestion problems.</bigger>
<bigger> Sincerely,</bigger>
<bigger> Milnor H. Senior, III</bigger>
<bigger> President - Bicycle Transportation Systems, Inc.</bigger>
</color></excerpt><color><param>0000,0000,ffff</param>
</color>
More information about the Sustran-discuss
mailing list