[sustran] Re: urban rail and transport problems in KL

Alan P Howes alanhowes at usaksa.com
Tue Oct 12 03:57:31 JST 1999


I do intend (when I get around to it) to respond to some of Charlie's
points - many of which raise more social issues than transport ones. I
can't help feeling that I have been here before though - no doubt on
misc.transport.urban-transit (which I can't get at from here).

On Sat, 02 Oct 1999 13:11:19 +1000, Charlie Richardson
<sydtrans at enternet.com.au> wrote:
>
>I believe it's necessary to look at little further under the surface to test the
>notions that "UK degregulation worked in that it achieved what the government
>wanted - big cuts in subsidy." .... and that "... the public as a whole (including
>taxpayers) got better value for money out of PT after Dereg than before it."


-- 
Alan & Jacqui Howes, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Formerly Perthshire, Scotland)
alanhowes at usaksa.com
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/alanhowes/  [Needs Updating!]
PLEASE DO NOT SEND LARGE MESSAGES (>100kB) WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE

*** A debt-free start for a billion people in the world's poorest  ***
*** countries - Jubilee 2000, http://www.jubilee2000uk.org         ***



More information about the Sustran-discuss mailing list