[sustran] RE: SUSTRAN News Flash #26
Thomas Walton
twalton at worldbank.org
Wed Sep 17 09:04:35 JST 1997
A short note on your piece about banning non-motorized
vehicles in Calcutta, which I certainly agree is a step
backwards from sustainable transport. I recently returned
from a short trip to Solo (Surakarta) a city of about 500,000
in Central Java. There the principal in-city mode of public
transport is the becak, a two-passenger, three-wheeled,
pedal-driven vehicle, with the operator behind. Solo, in its
wisdom, has created becak/bicycle lanes on both sides of its
main streets, separated from the automobile lanes by dividers,
many of which have trees on them. The effect and the
efficiency are wonderful.
Contrast this with Jakarta, which banned the becaks from the
city at least 6 years ago. Apparently (I was not living here
at the time), part of the government's becak phase-out policy
was to dump a large number of them in the sea. The disruption
to the families who depended on becak ownership for their
livelihood was significant -- there are stories of suicides by
becak owners who could not afford the price of the replacement
vehicle, the bajai (familiar in India where it originated, as
the bajaj). Now, Jakarta is phasing out the bajai in favor of
mini-buses. Already banned from the central business district
and many of the main arteries, they are still numerous in the
outer parts of Jakarta. Their disappearance would be great
for air quality, since they are driven by primitive two-stroke
engines, but it will be bad for traffic which is already
approaching Bangkok or Manila congestion levels.
It seems to me that about 4 years ago, there was talk in
Shanghai of a law that would ban bicycles from the city center
"to reduce congestion"?? I wonder what happened to that?
Tom Walton
More information about the Sustran-discuss
mailing list