[asia-apec 1270] Van Sun: No special security deals, Chretien aide says
David Webster
davidweb at home.com
Sat Aug 28 04:02:29 JST 1999
VANCOUVER SUN
Last updated: Friday 27 August 1999 NATIONAL NEWS
---------------------------------------------------------
No special security deals at APEC: Chretien aide
-------------------------------------------------------
IAN BAILEY
VANCOUVER (CP) - Visiting Indonesians were paranoid
about embarrassing protest, but they didn't get
special breaks on security at the controversial 1997
APEC summit, says Jean Chretien's top aide.
It was one of few key security areas that Jean
Pelletier, the prime minister's chief of staff, could
address with confidence Thursday as he testified at an
inquiry into RCMP treatment of protesters.
On many other issues, the seasoned Chretien aide and
former Quebec City mayor admitted he was out of the
loop - not present at meetings, not presented with
documents.
"We wouldn't do anything special for any leader -
including Suharto," said Pelletier, the second senior
Chretien aide to appear in a week before the RCMP
Public Complaints Commission hearing.
Each of the 18 visiting leaders, including U.S.
President Bill Clinton, got the same security
treatment, Pelletier told inquiry head Ted Hughes, who
has been hearing evidence for six months.
"It was not more or less," said Pelletier. "It was the
normal (security) practise - period."
The priority was to balance the rights of Canadian
protesters with the "common-sense dignity" of Pacific
leaders.
"In no way have I seen or heard any expression of
opinion wanting to, let's say, diminish the freedom of
expression of Canadians on Canadian soil," Pelletier
said.
All of this is important to the APEC inquiry because
of allegations that Chretien's office browbeat
Mounties into adopting security plans aimed at
limiting protest embarrassing to leaders at the
summit.
Indonesian officials were wary about the summit due to
fears their then-president Suharto would face protest
linked to his widely criticized record on human
rights.
During the summit, Mounties clashed with protesters as
leaders met in a retreat on the campus of the
University of British Columbia on Nov. 25, 1997.
Protesters were pepper sprayed and detained. Female
protesters were strip searched while males were not.
The melee was prompted more than 40 public complaints,
which have fuelled the elaborate hearing by Hughes.
More than 130 witnesses are expected to testify.
Pelletier said the Indonesian concern "was not a great
problem."
Later Thursday, a senior Canadian official involved in
organizing APEC said Canadian officials held meetings
with wary Indonesians as part of a program of
"reassurance" they would have offered other similarly
worried leaders.
"It was important for all leaders to be present," Len
Edwards, now Canada's ambassador to Japan, told the
inquiry.
The meetings included a session between Chretien and
Indonesia's Canadian ambassador, Benjamin Parwoto,
held two months before the summit.
"These were steps of reassurance," said Edwards. "We
were simply reassuring (the Indonesians) our normal
procedures would meet (Suharto's) requirements."
At the Chretien-Parwoto meeting, the prime minister
said Canada had experience in dealing with "difficult"
visits, citing a 1995 tour by Chinese Premier Li Peng,
according to a secret memo entered as evidence.
Canadian measures during that visit included back-door
hotel entries by Li so he could avoid protesters as
well as the use of a black curtain drawn across a
hotel lobby so the premier would not have to see
protesters.
Pelletier's testimony prompted one flare-up.
Anti-APEC protester David Malmo-Levine got into a
shouting match with Hughes when Malmo-Levine was
asking about future measures to deal with
demonstrators.
"I want to know whether protesters are to expect to be
pepper-sprayed and punched in the future," said
Malmo-Levine, who varies the colour of his hair with
each day of the hearing.
"Now, you're not going to put those questions to this
witness," Hughes said, his voice rising.
"If not this witness. . . ," asked Malmo-Levine.
"You are not going to," yelled Hughes. "I have ruled,
Mr. Malmo-Levine!"
Later, a subdued Hughes asked the commission's lawyers
to find a witness who could deal with Malmo-Levine's
concerns.
In other testimony Thursday, Pelletier denied that any
Chretien official would have overstepped their powers
in dealing with police.
"Freedom of speech is something (Chretien's) got in
his heart so I would imagine nobody on our team
deliberately acting in such a way that would confront
the philosophy of the PM in these matters," he said.
Pelletier did concede to a role in one security and
protest-related matter, suggesting he mediated a
dispute between another Chretien aide, Jean Carle, and
the University of British Columbia on a security
fence.
More information about the Asia-apec
mailing list