[asia-apec 605] Interview with Mahathir about recent currency policy (part 3 of 3)
PAN Asia Pacific
panap at panap.po.my
Thu Sep 3 12:24:55 JST 1998
Interview (cont'd)
Q: Despite the evidence we see today, the IMF and other international
agencies are not very keen to come in and stabilise the economy. Despite
the fact that that is is actually their mandate. Can Datuk Seri enlighthen us
what is the rationale that they are not helping us through.
Dr M: They see in our trouble a means to force us to accept certain
regimes. They want us to have reforms, meaning to say we should open
our market wide for foreign companies to come in and do business
without any conditions whatsoever. Their help is always based on that...
we will give you the money provided you open up the economy. And
when we open up our economy, we will of course lose control of our
economy, all our companies, all our banks and all our industries will
belong to foreigners.
In Malaysia, in particular, we are in the process of restructuring the
economy, we can't do that because they will object to any conditions
being imposed upon them. So the IMF should in fact be helping
developing countries which are in financial trouble but it wants to use the
financial trouble in other countries to enable the giant companies from the
rich countries to come in and take over the economy. That seems to me
to be their objectives rather than helping. Of course they say reforms, but
reforms (to) them means something beneficial to the developed countries.
In fact among the speculators they actually say openly," we want to see
blood. In others words we want to see killings. You know these
companies must be killed, that is a measure of how serious you are about
reforms. I can't understand that because we have seen blood enough. In
some countries, millions of workers are unemployed now and they have
no food, no medicine, no milk for their children and all thess people can
think of is that this is the price we have to pay for the reforms and
reforms are good for you.
Q: Datuk Seri, in this regard do you see that this move taken by us can
put a spanner in the works of the speculators?
Dr M: We think so. That is the purpose in fact. We have to take the
speculators out of the currency trade involving the ringgit. Because of
course currencies need to be changed in order to trade to finance trade.
That we can do without the speculators. We can do even without the
hedge funds.
Q: Datuk Seri, do you think other developing economies will come
forward and do the same thing we have done here?
Dr M: Well there are signs that people are losing faith in the operations
of the free market. That's why Hong Kong went in in order to curb the
speculators. Now Taiwan has given warning to (financial speculator
George Soros) not to come to Taiwan and China has refused to allow its
currency to be freely convertable. Now Russia has second thoughts, they
may even go back to communism. Of course we have seen what Chile
and Slovenia have done. People can realy find that when the system is
abused and they suffer,then they are prepared to change. But some
countries apparenly benefit from the abuses.
Q: There is talk that following the implementation of these measures,
deposits, people's savings in banks will be frozen. Is there any truth in
this?
Dr M: There is no reason. There is no reason. The internal economy is
not touched in this matter.The domestic economy will become stronger,
traders can trade without being disturbed by the fall in the value of the
ringgit and share prices. The domestic financial system will become
stronger and there is no reason for us to freeze fixed deposits for
instance. The money in the bank is safe and will not be touched.
Q: Our people going for the Umrah in Mecca, usually bring along our
ringgit and then go and exchange it there but lately our Malaysian money
is not popular in Mecca or in Medina so if we want to perform the haj,
they get the ringgit and buy US dollars or Riyal here and they will have no
problem in getting the money.
Dr M: There is no problem of accommodation and surely the money
they wish to bring will not be a big amount exceeding their needs but if
they really need a big amount, we will arrange for them to change ringgit
into riyal or pound or any currency they preferred. We can give them.
Q: Is this governed by the regulation that it should not exceed
RM10,000?
Dr M: The maximum is RM10,000 but if they have to spend more than
that and if they provide the proof there is no reason why we should not
consider.
Hence we do not at all have any plans to restrict such trips. It has never
crossed the government's mind.
We want our economy to expand and progress and to impose controls
which would not benefit the people... surely the government would not
want this. It only wants our country and the economy to recover and we
are confident that with the various measures in place and that to be
further taken, we will ensure that the economy recovered.
Previously we were unable to take the measures. For each time we want
our economy to recover, they will hit at our ringgit and shares so that we
become poorer.... so poor that we will have to seek IMF help and then
we will lose our freedom.
Q: From Jan 1 till June, our economy contracted by 6.8 per cent, how
do we explain this to the people as many are not clear as to what this
contraction means.
Dr M: If we want to take into account trading and economic activities,
we can create wealth through this. But if there is less trade, fewer
economic activities, there will be less money. This is what is happening.
The question is why is it happening? For instance we are producers of
microchips for computers but the demand for this had fallen because the
whole of East Asia had become poor, unable to buy computers and so
on. In Europe also demand had fallen and America is unable to sell
computers to developing countries as they make computers but not all of
them are sold in America which has a lot of money and they need to
export and their own markets (East Asia) had been destroyed.
For instance we are a market for Boeing aircraft but now we no longer
buy the aircraft as tourism has fallen and the need for such planes had
fallen and so we are not buying and the US economy will decline and
when the economy declines the market for our goods also becomes
smaller.
The Japanese market had also declined and so demand for our usual
exports to them had fallen and this had resulted in our trading and
economic ectivities contracting by 6.8 per cent and not from January to
June but in the second quarter (three months) from April to June. From
January to March (first quarter, first three months) it contracted by 1.8
per cent.
Q: Do you expect measures being taken will lead to a lower contraction
of the economy and probably in six months result in a slight economic
growth, or at least some growth?
Dr M: I'm confident there would be some growth, because now we are
focusing not on export activites but on domestic activities and that is why
the government will spur infrastructure projects and the construction
industry, which means we will spend a lot of money. The construction
industry will generate activities in 140 other related industries such as
creation of jobs, demand for building materials and if people have
disposable income they will spend and all these will mean economic
activities. But we have to remember that if we have money but do not
spend, or do not save in banks but keep it at home, the money will be
meaningless to the economy.
But if the money is used 10 times daily, it will have the multiplier effect
and everytime it is used, there will be people who will have money and
the people with money will in turn spend it and make profit and the progit
will generate the economy. So in this way we can develop our economy
and that is why we would like to see, for example, more houses being
built and bought and we find that the market for low-cost housing is still
very good, so also medium-cost houses and if traders make profit, even
luxury houses can be sold. We like to see our economy revived in this
way.
Q: Datuk Seri, do we have any changes to our investment policy?
Dr M: No changes to our investment policy, they will still have the same
treatment, privileges, tax-free incentives that we normally give. They will
have all those and at the same time they can bring in money and they can
take out money what is theirs, if they make a profit. Yes, they can take
out their profit, and in order to make a profit they have to produce
something which they sell, and we'll benefit from their activity of selling
especially if they export, if say they export 10 million dollars of goods,
they will bring back that 10 million dollars, their profit maybe one million
dollars. That one million dollars, take it and repatriate it to their country
we don't mind that, but they have to earn the profit first before they can
repatriate, they can't simply take the money here and convert into foreign
exchange and then send out.
Q: You have said that the government will spend huge sums of money for
infrastructure projects, who will build these projects, will the government
reassume the role of implementors or will the government continue to do
so via privatization?
Dr M: I always believe that the government is less efficient. That's why
we go for privatization and it doesn't matter if the money is from the
government or the private sector, what is important is money changing
hands. When there are economic activities, money will change hands,
whether from the government to the private sector or between the private
sector itself or to the workers, suppliers, the transport industry people, all
these will happen if we spend money. Government or private sector is
not the problem, what is important is that money is moved around and
not just being kept idle.
I'm confident that if the value of their shares once again is commensurate
with the nett assets and the value of our currency is again stable, the
companies will recover, if not fully recover, at least their NPLs will be
reduced and they can borrow once more. If they can borrow, they can
carry out economic activities and make profits and profitable activities
will enable them to repay their loans and in this way, they can be revived.
Q: Datuk Seri, there must be a sense of urgency all-round in reviving the
economy?
Dr M: Yes, I hope that everybody will understand that time really means
money, everybody must work harder than usual, in the government I
expect the people to work day and night to help the economy to recover.
Ministers have been instructed that they must work day and night, they
must go and see what's happening on the ground, not enough by just
giving direction, go back and sleep, no way they can work that way now
and government officers have been told, everybody has been told that
you must work extra hard, because we are facing a very difficult
economic situation and the only way we can overcome that is really to
work very hard and not allow your kind of easy going way to interfere
with the economic recovery in this country.
--Bernama
More information about the Asia-apec
mailing list